From: Brice Goglin <brice@myri.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] myri10ge Large Receive Offload
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:16:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <451D9B4C.3020008@myri.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <451B4F44.60204@garzik.org>
Jeff Garzik a écrit :
> Brice Goglin wrote:
>> This is a complete rework of the myri10ge receive path. The first
>> patch converts skb allocation to use physical pages. The second one
>> adds a software implementation of Large Receive Offload. The third
>> one updates the driver version to 1.1.0.
>>
>> The complete driver code in our CVS actually also supports high-order
>> allocations instead of single physical pages since it significantly
>> increase the performance. Order=2 allows us to receive standard frames
>> at line rate even on low-end hardware such as an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2
>> Dual Core Processor 3800+ (2.0GHz). Some customer might not care a lot
>> about memory fragmentation if the performance is better.
>>
>> But, since high-order allocations are generally considered a bad idea,
>> we do not include the relevant code in the following patch for inclusion
>> in Linux. Here, we simply pass order=0 to all page allocation routines.
>> If necessary, I could drop the remaining reference to high-order
>> (especially replace alloc_pages() with alloc_page()) but I'd rather
>> keep it as is.
>>
>> If high-order allocations are ever considered OK under some circum-
>> stances, we could send an additional patch (a module parameter would
>> be used to switch from single physical pages to high-order pages).
>
> As Herbert's already done, I would rather let the net core people
> comment on this. The code implementation doesn't look scary, but we
> may want to be smarter about this in the core net stack, rather than
> implementing it inside multiple drivers.
Ok, makes sense. We look forward to see this.
Could we get patch #1 merged anyway (page-based skb allocation)?
Any comments about what I was saying about high-order allocations above?
thanks,
Brice
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-29 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-27 23:12 [PATCH 0/3] myri10ge Large Receive Offload Brice Goglin
2006-09-28 0:53 ` Herbert Xu
2006-09-28 4:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-29 22:16 ` Brice Goglin [this message]
2006-09-30 9:38 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-09-30 21:39 ` Brice Goglin
2006-09-30 14:01 ` Brice Goglin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=451D9B4C.3020008@myri.com \
--to=brice@myri.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).