* [PATCH 2/9] secid reconciliation-v04: Add LSM hooks
@ 2006-10-01 21:26 Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-02 16:40 ` Stephen Smalley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Venkat Yekkirala @ 2006-10-01 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: selinux, jmorris, sds, paul.moore, eparis
Add skb_policy_check and skb_netfilter_check hooks to LSM to enable
reconciliation of the various security identifiers as well as enforce
flow control on inbound (PREROUTING/INPUT) and outbound (OUTPUT/FORWARD/POSTROUTING)
traffic.
Signed-off-by: Venkat Yekkirala <vyekkirala@TrustedCS.com>
---
include/linux/security.h | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
security/dummy.c | 13 +++++++++++
2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index 9f56fb8..84b826b 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -828,6 +828,15 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
* Sets the new child socket's sid to the openreq sid.
* @req_classify_flow:
* Sets the flow's sid to the openreq sid.
+ * @skb_flow_in:
+ * Checks to see if security policy would allow skb into the system
+ * while also reconciling the xfrm secid, cipso, etc, if any, and
+ * relabeling the skb with the reconciled secid.
+ * Returns 1 if skb allowed into system, 0 otherwise.
+ * @skb_flow_out:
+ * Checks to see if security policy would allow skb to go out of system.
+ * Returns 1 if skb allowed out of system, 0 if not, and -ENOENT if there's
+ * no hook defined.
*
* Security hooks for XFRM operations.
*
@@ -1372,6 +1381,8 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK
struct request_sock *req);
void (*inet_csk_clone)(struct sock *newsk, const struct request_sock *req);
void (*req_classify_flow)(const struct request_sock *req, struct flowi *fl);
+ int (*skb_flow_in)(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned short family);
+ int (*skb_flow_out)(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 nf_secid);
#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK */
#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM
@@ -2946,6 +2957,18 @@ static inline void security_req_classify
security_ops->req_classify_flow(req, fl);
}
+static inline int security_skb_flow_in(struct sk_buff *skb,
+ unsigned short family)
+{
+ return security_ops->skb_flow_in(skb, family);
+}
+
+static inline int security_skb_flow_out(struct sk_buff *skb,
+ u32 nf_secid)
+{
+ return security_ops->skb_flow_out(skb, nf_secid);
+}
+
static inline void security_sock_graft(struct sock* sk, struct socket *parent)
{
security_ops->sock_graft(sk, parent);
@@ -3097,6 +3120,18 @@ static inline void security_req_classify
{
}
+static inline int security_skb_flow_in(struct sk_buff *skb,
+ unsigned short family)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+static inline int security_skb_flow_out(struct sk_buff *skb,
+ u32 nf_secid)
+{
+ return -ENOENT;
+}
+
static inline void security_sock_graft(struct sock* sk, struct socket *parent)
{
}
@@ -3150,7 +3185,11 @@ static inline int security_xfrm_state_al
{
if (!polsec)
return 0;
- return security_ops->xfrm_state_alloc_security(x, NULL, polsec, secid);
+ /*
+ * No need to pass polsec along since we want the context to be
+ * taken from secid which is usually from the sock.
+ */
+ return security_ops->xfrm_state_alloc_security(x, NULL, NULL, secid);
}
static inline int security_xfrm_state_delete(struct xfrm_state *x)
diff --git a/security/dummy.c b/security/dummy.c
index aeee705..921be56 100644
--- a/security/dummy.c
+++ b/security/dummy.c
@@ -832,6 +832,17 @@ static inline void dummy_req_classify_fl
struct flowi *fl)
{
}
+
+static inline int dummy_skb_flow_in(struct sk_buff *skb,
+ unsigned short family)
+{
+ return -ENOENT;
+}
+
+static inline int dummy_skb_flow_out(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 nf_secid)
+{
+ return -ENOENT;
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK */
#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM
@@ -1108,6 +1119,8 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK
set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, inet_conn_request);
set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, inet_csk_clone);
set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, req_classify_flow);
+ set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, skb_flow_in);
+ set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, skb_flow_out);
#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK */
#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM
set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, xfrm_policy_alloc_security);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/9] secid reconciliation-v04: Add LSM hooks
2006-10-01 21:26 [PATCH 2/9] secid reconciliation-v04: Add LSM hooks Venkat Yekkirala
@ 2006-10-02 16:40 ` Stephen Smalley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Smalley @ 2006-10-02 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Venkat Yekkirala; +Cc: netdev, selinux, jmorris, paul.moore, eparis
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 16:26 -0500, Venkat Yekkirala wrote:
> Add skb_policy_check and skb_netfilter_check hooks to LSM to enable
> reconciliation of the various security identifiers as well as enforce
> flow control on inbound (PREROUTING/INPUT) and outbound (OUTPUT/FORWARD/POSTROUTING)
> traffic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Venkat Yekkirala <vyekkirala@TrustedCS.com>
> ---
> include/linux/security.h | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> security/dummy.c | 13 +++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> @@ -3150,7 +3185,11 @@ static inline int security_xfrm_state_al
> {
> if (!polsec)
> return 0;
> - return security_ops->xfrm_state_alloc_security(x, NULL, polsec, secid);
> + /*
> + * No need to pass polsec along since we want the context to be
> + * taken from secid which is usually from the sock.
> + */
> + return security_ops->xfrm_state_alloc_security(x, NULL, NULL, secid);
> }
As a follow-up patch, you could then drop polsec from the hook interface
in security_ops (but not the static inline function interface), and from
the underlying selinux functions. That would simplify
selinux_xfrm_sec_ctx_alloc() a bit and make the logic clearer.
--
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-10-02 16:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-10-01 21:26 [PATCH 2/9] secid reconciliation-v04: Add LSM hooks Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-02 16:40 ` Stephen Smalley
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).