netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kkeil@suse.de,
	kai.germaschewski@gmx.de, isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de,
	mac@melware.de, markus.lidel@shadowconnect.com,
	samuel@sortiz.org, Neela.Kolli@engenio.com,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	thomas@winischhofer.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce BROKEN_ON_64BIT facility
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 05:54:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4520E1CB.6070104@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p737izjhwpa.fsf@verdi.suse.de>

Andi Kleen wrote:
> Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> writes:
> 
>> Add a broken-on-64bit option, similar to the existing broken-on-smp
>> config option.  This is just the first pass, marking the obvious
>> candidates.
> 
> When I had this problem in the past I just used && !64BIT.
> How is this new option different?

Same reason why we have CONFIG_BROKEN_ON_SMP separate from CONFIG_SMP.


> AFAIK I2O got fixed too. Do you have any evidence that it is really
> broken on 64bit?

i2o_config did not.  Just read the code, it's obvious...

	Jeff



  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-02  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-02  4:55 [PATCH] Introduce BROKEN_ON_64BIT facility Jeff Garzik
2006-10-02  9:51 ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-02  9:54   ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-10-02 14:19     ` Markus Lidel
2006-10-02 13:03 ` Alan Cox
2006-10-02 13:52 ` chas williams - CONTRACTOR
2006-10-02 15:12   ` Alan Cox
2006-10-02 15:18     ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-02 16:21       ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4520E1CB.6070104@garzik.org \
    --to=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=Neela.Kolli@engenio.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de \
    --cc=kai.germaschewski@gmx.de \
    --cc=kkeil@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mac@melware.de \
    --cc=markus.lidel@shadowconnect.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=samuel@sortiz.org \
    --cc=thomas@winischhofer.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).