From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Moore Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2 8/8] selinux: use generic union inet_addr Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 10:34:07 -0400 Message-ID: <4528870.px4VD3WrY3@sifl> References: <1375427674-21735-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <1375427674-21735-9-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , James Morris , Stephen Smalley , Eric Paris , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org To: Cong Wang Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1375427674-21735-9-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> Sender: linux-security-module-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Friday, August 02, 2013 03:14:34 PM Cong Wang wrote: > From: Cong Wang > > selinux has some similar definition like union inet_addr, > it can re-use the generic union inet_addr too. > > Cc: James Morris > Cc: Stephen Smalley > Cc: Eric Paris > Cc: Paul Moore > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang Perhaps I'm confusing this with another patch but I though DaveM said he wasn't going to merge these patches? -- paul moore security and virtualization @ redhat