From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] round_jiffies users Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 01:52:23 +0200 Message-ID: <452C3237.6010708@linux.intel.com> References: <1160496165.3000.308.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1160496210.3000.310.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1160496263.3000.312.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20061010154717.e2c4c149.paul@permanentmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, akpm@osdl.org, mingo@elte.hu Return-path: Received: from mga07.intel.com ([143.182.124.22]:33194 "EHLO azsmga101.ch.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932284AbWJJXwo (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:52:44 -0400 To: Paul Dickson In-Reply-To: <20061010154717.e2c4c149.paul@permanentmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Paul Dickson wrote: > On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:04:23 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > >> + mod_timer(&adapter->phy_info_timer, round_jiffies(jiffies + 2 * HZ)); > > Shouldn't round_jiffies_relative be used for some of these, a la: > > + mod_timer(&adapter->phy_info_timer, round_jiffies_relative(2 * HZ)); > mod_timer() takes an absolute jiffies value as argument, so... no :)