netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Heffner <jheffner@psc.edu>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: shemminger@osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bound TSO defer time (resend)
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 08:22:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4534CAF3.5000505@psc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061016.223513.35356292.davem@davemloft.net>

David Miller wrote:
> From: John Heffner <jheffner@psc.edu>
> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:18:33 -0400
> 
>> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:53:20 -0400 (EDT)
>>> John Heffner <jheffner@psc.edu> wrote:
>>>> This patch limits the amount of time you will defer sending a TSO segment
>>>> to less than two clock ticks, or the time between two acks, whichever is
>>>> longer.
>>> Okay, but doing any timing on clock ticks makes the behavior dependent
>>> on the value of HZ which doesn't seem desirable. Should this be based
>>> on RTT or a real-time values?
>> It would be nice to use a high res clock so you don't depend on HZ, but 
>> this is still expensive on most SMP arch's as I understand it.
> 
> Right so we do need to use a jiffies based solution.
> 
> Since HZ is variable, I have a feeling that the thing to do here
> is pick some timeout in msec.  Then replace the "2 clock ticks"
> with some msec_to_jiffies() calls, bottoming out at 1 jiffie.
> 
> How does that sound?

That's actually how I originally coded it. :)  But then it occurred to 
me that if you've already been waiting for a full clock tick, the 
marginal CPU savings of waiting longer will not be great.  Which is why 
I chose the value of 2 ticks so you're guaranteed to have waited at 
least one full tick.

   -John

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-17 12:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-17  0:53 [PATCH] Bound TSO defer time (resend) John Heffner
2006-10-17  3:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-17  4:18   ` John Heffner
2006-10-17  5:35     ` David Miller
2006-10-17 12:22       ` John Heffner [this message]
2006-10-19  3:39         ` David Miller
2006-10-17 12:58       ` [PATCH] [NET] Size listen hash tables using backlog hint Eric Dumazet Hi
2006-10-18  7:38         ` [PATCH] [NET] inet_peer : group together avl_left, avl_right, v4daddr to speedup lookups on some CPUS Eric Dumazet
2006-10-18 16:35           ` [PATCH] [NET] reduce per cpu ram used for loopback stats Eric Dumazet
2006-10-18 17:00             ` [PATCH, resent] " Eric Dumazet
2006-10-19  3:53               ` David Miller
2006-10-19  3:53             ` [PATCH] " David Miller
2006-10-19  3:44           ` [PATCH] [NET] inet_peer : group together avl_left, avl_right, v4daddr to speedup lookups on some CPUS David Miller
2006-10-19 10:57           ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-19 15:45             ` [PATCH] [NET] One NET_INC_STATS() could be NET_INC_STATS_BH in tcp_v4_err() Eric Dumazet
2006-10-20  7:22               ` David Miller
2006-10-20 14:21                 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2006-10-20  7:28             ` [PATCH] [NET] inet_peer : group together avl_left, avl_right, v4daddr to speedup lookups on some CPUS David Miller
2006-10-19  3:31         ` [PATCH] [NET] Size listen hash tables using backlog hint David Miller
2006-10-19  4:54           ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-19  5:08             ` David Miller
2006-10-19  5:12           ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-19  6:12             ` David Miller
2006-10-19  6:34               ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-19  6:57                 ` David Miller
2006-10-19  8:29                   ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-19  8:41                     ` David Miller
2006-10-19  9:11                       ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-19  9:27         ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-20  7:27           ` David Miller
2006-10-18 15:37     ` [PATCH] Bound TSO defer time (resend) Andi Kleen
2006-10-18 16:40       ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4534CAF3.5000505@psc.edu \
    --to=jheffner@psc.edu \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).