From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST 1/2] NET: Accurate packet scheduling	for	ATM/ADSL
 (kernel)
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:54:00 +0200
Message-ID: <45388EA8.3090103@trash.net>
References: <1161041677.6247.1.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube>	 <1161090444.5555.13.camel@jzny2>  <45378DE3.8080700@trash.net> <1161305354.5034.50.camel@jzny2>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Russell Stuart <russell-tcatm@stuart.id.au>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@diku.dk>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:39819 "EHLO
	stinky.trash.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932208AbWJTIyQ
	(ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 20 Oct 2006 04:54:16 -0400
To: hadi@cyberus.ca
In-Reply-To: <1161305354.5034.50.camel@jzny2>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

jamal wrote:
> The poor guy has been persistent and has some good ideas and we need to
> encourage him to stick around.  Why dont you help him get the patch in
> the shape you think is reasonable? I know you are busy elsewhere and
> your patch has been a while since you last promised. I will try to help
> as well. 

I have explained what I would like to see several times and sent
a patch to demonstrate it. I'd be happy to help further (I would
like to see this go in eventually), but there's nothing I can do
besides repeating myself as long as we only get to see the same
patch again and again.