netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@google.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Strange errors from e1000 driver (2.6.18)
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 12:05:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <453BC0E7.1060308@mbligh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <453BBC9E.4040300@google.com>

Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> I'm getting a lot of these type of errors if I run 2.6.18. If
> I run the standard Ubuntu Dapper kernel, I don't get them.
> What do they indicate?
> 
> Oct 21 18:48:28 localhost kernel: buffer_info[next_to_clean]
> Oct 21 18:48:28 localhost kernel:   time_stamp           <7b79d33>
> Oct 21 18:48:28 localhost kernel:   next_to_watch        <3d>
> Oct 21 18:48:28 localhost kernel:   jiffies              <7b7a0c1>
> Oct 21 18:48:28 localhost kernel:   next_to_watch.status <0>
> Oct 21 18:48:30 localhost kernel:   Tx Queue             <0>
> Oct 21 18:48:30 localhost kernel:   TDH                  <3d>
> Oct 21 18:48:30 localhost kernel:   TDT                  <44>
> Oct 21 18:48:30 localhost kernel:   next_to_use          <44>
> Oct 21 18:48:30 localhost kernel:   next_to_clean        <39>
> Oct 21 18:48:30 localhost kernel: buffer_info[next_to_clean]
> Oct 21 18:48:30 localhost kernel:   time_stamp           <7b79d33>
> Oct 21 18:48:30 localhost kernel:   next_to_watch        <3d>
> Oct 21 18:48:30 localhost kernel:   jiffies              <7b7a2b5>
> Oct 21 18:48:30 localhost kernel:   next_to_watch.status <0>
> Oct 21 18:48:32 localhost kernel:   Tx Queue             <0>
> Oct 21 18:48:32 localhost kernel:   TDH                  <3d>
> Oct 21 18:48:32 localhost kernel:   TDT                  <44>
> Oct 21 18:48:32 localhost kernel:   next_to_use          <44>
> Oct 21 18:48:32 localhost kernel:   next_to_clean        <39>
> Oct 21 18:48:32 localhost kernel: buffer_info[next_to_clean]
> Oct 21 18:48:32 localhost kernel:   time_stamp           <7b79d33>
> Oct 21 18:48:32 localhost kernel:   next_to_watch        <3d>
> Oct 21 18:48:32 localhost kernel:   jiffies              <7b7a4a9>
> Oct 21 18:48:32 localhost kernel:   next_to_watch.status <0>
> Oct 21 18:48:34 localhost kernel:   Tx Queue             <0>
> Oct 21 18:48:34 localhost kernel:   TDH                  <3d>
> Oct 21 18:48:34 localhost kernel:   TDT                  <44>
> Oct 21 18:48:34 localhost kernel:   next_to_use          <44>
> Oct 21 18:48:34 localhost kernel:   next_to_clean        <39>
> Oct 21 18:48:34 localhost kernel: buffer_info[next_to_clean]
> Oct 21 18:48:34 localhost kernel:   time_stamp           <7b79d33>
> Oct 21 18:48:34 localhost kernel:   next_to_watch        <3d>
> Oct 21 18:48:34 localhost kernel:   jiffies              <7b7a69d>
> Oct 21 18:48:34 localhost kernel:   next_to_watch.status <0>
> Oct 21 18:48:35 localhost kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
> Oct 21 18:48:36 localhost kernel: e1000: eth0: e1000_watchdog: NIC Link 
> is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex

Actually, maybe this set is more helpful:

e1000: eth0: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang
   Tx Queue             <0>
   TDH                  <6>
   TDT                  <1f>
   next_to_use          <1f>
   next_to_clean        <2>
buffer_info[next_to_clean]
   time_stamp           <2de8b54>
   next_to_watch        <6>
   jiffies              <2de8db7>
   next_to_watch.status <0>
e1000: eth0: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang
   Tx Queue             <0>
   TDH                  <6>
   TDT                  <1f>
   next_to_use          <1f>
   next_to_clean        <2>
buffer_info[next_to_clean]
   time_stamp           <2de8b54>
   next_to_watch        <6>
   jiffies              <2de8fab>
   next_to_watch.status <0>
e1000: eth0: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang
   Tx Queue             <0>
   TDH                  <6>
   TDT                  <1f>
   next_to_use          <1f>
   next_to_clean        <2>
buffer_info[next_to_clean]
   time_stamp           <2de8b54>
   next_to_watch        <6>
   jiffies              <2de919f>
   next_to_watch.status <0>
NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
e1000: eth0: e1000_watchdog: NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex



  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-22 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-22 18:46 Strange errors from e1000 driver (2.6.18) Martin J. Bligh
2006-10-22 19:05 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2006-10-22 20:21   ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-10-22 20:27     ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-10-22 22:15       ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-10-22 22:32         ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-10-22 23:29           ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-10-22 23:02       ` Dumitru Ciobarcianu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=453BC0E7.1060308@mbligh.org \
    --to=mbligh@mbligh.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).