Jesse Brandeburg wrote: > On 10/22/06, Martin J. Bligh wrote: >> Martin J. Bligh wrote: >> > I'm getting a lot of these type of errors if I run 2.6.18. If >> > I run the standard Ubuntu Dapper kernel, I don't get them. >> > What do they indicate? > > Hi Martin, they indicate that you're getting transmit hangs. Means > your hardware is having issues with some of the buffers it is being > handed. Because the TDH and TDT noted below are not equal, it means > the hardware is hung processing buffers that the driver gave to it. > > We need the standard bug report particulars, Sure. > lspci -vv, 0000:00:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82546EB Gigabit Ethernet Con troller (Copper) (rev 01) Subsystem: Intel Corporation PRO/1000 MT Dual Port Server Adapter Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Step ping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- cat /proc/interrupts, CPU0 0: 146271373 XT-PIC timer 1: 179459 XT-PIC i8042 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 5: 1975991 XT-PIC ehci_hcd:usb2, VIA8237, eth0 6: 2 XT-PIC floppy 10: 0 XT-PIC uhci_hcd:usb4, uhci_hcd:usb5, uhci_hcd:usb6 11: 0 XT-PIC ehci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb3, uhci_hcd:usb7, uhci_hcd:usb8 12: 2758142 XT-PIC i8042 14: 6344745 XT-PIC ide0 15: 20014468 XT-PIC ide1 NMI: 0 LOC: 146264664 ERR: 52805 > dmesg Did that bit already. > ethtool -e eth0, root@titus:/usr/local/autotest/bin # ethtool -e eth0 Offset Values ------ ------ 0x0000 00 07 e9 09 0b 08 30 05 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x0010 44 a9 03 98 0b 46 11 10 86 80 10 10 86 80 68 34 0x0020 0c 00 10 10 00 00 02 21 c8 18 ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x0030 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x0040 0c c3 61 78 04 50 02 21 c8 08 ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x0050 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 02 06 0x0060 2c 00 00 40 07 11 00 00 2c 00 00 40 ff ff ff ff 0x0070 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 4f 29 0x0080 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x0090 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x00a0 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x00b0 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x00c0 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x00d0 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x00e0 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x00f0 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x0100 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x0110 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x0120 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x0130 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x0140 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x0150 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x0160 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x0170 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x0180 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x0190 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x01a0 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x01b0 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x01c0 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x01d0 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x01e0 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x01f0 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > and maybe output of > dmidecode, etc. Attached. > only a little. There are so many different pieces of e1000 hardware > and so few specifics in this report that I'll be able to tell you lots > more when you get us the info requested. Thanks. Not sure if the bug wasn't there in earlier kernels, or if we just weren't printing anything. M.