From: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
To: Anders Grafstrom <grfstrm@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>,
Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: e100: Wait for PHY reset to complete?
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:26:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <453FD677.7060405@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <453FC693.10705@intel.com>
Auke Kok wrote:
> Francois Romieu wrote:
>> Anders Grafstrom <grfstrm@users.sourceforge.net> :
>> [...]
>>> I'm thinking something like this patch.
>>
>> I do not have the spec for the max duration at hand but it makes sense.
>>
>> Can you:
>> - decrease the duration of each sleep and increase the count of
>> iterations
>> - put the break on a line of its own
>> - add a Signed-off-by: Foo Bar <baz@nit.fol> line
>> - Cc: jeff@garzik.org and Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
>
> I'm already checking out specs, which, for 8255x devices, are available
> on http://e1000.sf.net/ .
okay, I don't think this is needed at all:
Allthough the spec itself didn't talk about phy reset times, I've ran this patch with
some debugging output on a few boxes and did some speed/duplex settings, and the PHY
reset returned succesfull after the very first mdio_read, which is before any msleep(10)
is executed. That is also expected behaviour.
I think you might be confusing this with a MAC reset, which has a documented 10usec
timeout (see 8255x developers manual). The driver already adheres to this by doing a
20usec delay after software/selective resets.
which gets us back to the original problem: how did your driver end up in loopback mode?
(and, how did you figure out that it did??).
Cheers,
Auke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-25 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-25 17:22 e100: Wait for PHY reset to complete? Anders Grafstrom
2006-10-25 18:56 ` Francois Romieu
2006-10-25 20:18 ` Auke Kok
2006-10-25 21:26 ` Auke Kok [this message]
2006-10-25 21:57 ` Francois Romieu
2006-10-25 23:36 ` Anders Grafström
2006-10-26 1:07 ` Auke Kok
2006-10-30 19:05 ` Auke Kok
2006-10-31 18:10 ` Anders Grafström
2006-10-31 18:34 ` Auke Kok
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=453FD677.7060405@intel.com \
--to=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=grfstrm@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).