From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jochen Friedrich Subject: Re: [patch] d80211: use pfifo_qdisc_ops rather than d80211-specific qdisc Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:41:30 +0100 Message-ID: <454A039A.1050701@scram.de> References: <20061026050416.GB14199@havoc.gtf.org> <20061101112805.246e1b3b@griffin.suse.cz> <20061101142022.GC21668@tuxdriver.com> <4548E7F7.7030100@linux.intel.com> <20061102121657.GA13468@infradead.org> <20061102150550.5c30f704@midnight> <20061102141815.GA1795@infradead.org> <1162477954.10786.11.camel@ux156> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jiri Benc , James Ketrenos , "John W. Linville" , Simon Barber , Jeff Garzik , Patrick McHardy , David Kimdon , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail0.scram.de ([195.226.127.110]:46091 "EHLO mail0.scram.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750948AbWKBOmI (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Nov 2006 09:42:08 -0500 To: Johannes Berg In-Reply-To: <1162477954.10786.11.camel@ux156> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi Johannes, > On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 14:18 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >> This is not about the name that makes sense. I think using ethX names >> for wireless devices is utterly stupid, but it's what all current upstream >> drivers do, and at least for WE compat we'll have to stick to it. > > No, that's not true, zd1201 doesn't [1] :) Neither does hostap [2] :) Thanks, Jochen [2] http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;h=ed00ebb6e7f4bd255d1a1fe8bf05a6f7a5574d6e;hb=aefba081d7b7dfd1c5752f6e6e709d8b5ab80ab7;f=drivers/net/wireless/hostap/hostap_hw.c#l84