From: Chris Lalancette <clalance@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Zero checksum in netconsole/netdump packets
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 18:40:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <454FC80B.9090001@redhat.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 836 bytes --]
Hello,
I was reading some tcpdump's of netdump traffic today, and I realized that all of the packets that go from the crashing machine to the netdump server have a zero checksum. Looking at the code, it looks like netconsole/netdump use the function netpoll_send_udp to send out the packets. However, in netdump_send_udp, the checksum is set to 0, and never seems to be computed. Is this intentional, or just an oversight? I would think that we would always want to compute the UDP checksum, but there might be something I am overlooking. Incidentally, it seems like the only user of netpoll_send_udp is netconsole (and netdump in RedHat kernels).
Assuming that this is just an oversight, attached is a simple patch to compute the UDP checksum in netpoll_send_udp.
Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <clalance@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #2: linux-2.6.19-rc4-netpoll-udp-checksum.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 598 bytes --]
--- linux-2.6/net/core/netpoll.c.orig 2006-11-06 18:16:58.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6/net/core/netpoll.c 2006-11-06 18:31:20.000000000 -0500
@@ -356,6 +356,10 @@ void netpoll_send_udp(struct netpoll *np
put_unaligned(htonl(np->remote_ip), &(iph->daddr));
iph->check = ip_fast_csum((unsigned char *)iph, iph->ihl);
+ udph->check = csum_tcpudp_magic(iph->saddr, iph->daddr, udp_len,
+ IPPROTO_UDP,
+ csum_partial((unsigned char *)udph, udp_len, 0));
+
eth = (struct ethhdr *) skb_push(skb, ETH_HLEN);
skb->mac.raw = skb->data;
skb->protocol = eth->h_proto = htons(ETH_P_IP);
next reply other threads:[~2006-11-06 23:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-06 23:40 Chris Lalancette [this message]
2006-11-07 7:16 ` Zero checksum in netconsole/netdump packets David Miller
2006-11-07 13:33 ` Chris Lalancette
2006-11-07 22:56 ` David Miller
2006-11-07 10:09 ` Gerrit Renker
2006-11-07 11:35 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=454FC80B.9090001@redhat.com \
--to=clalance@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).