netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] IPv6: optimize echo reply checksum calculation
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:25:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4554A811.5060402@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061109.151402.15590179.davem@davemloft.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 269 bytes --]

Since the only difference between echo requests and echo replies is the 
ICMPv6 type value (which is a difference of 1), just subtracting one 
from the request checksum will result in the correct checksum for the reply.

Signed-off-by: Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com>

[-- Attachment #2: no.cksum.echo.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2414 bytes --]

diff --git a/net/ipv6/icmp.c b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
index dbb9b1f..ee04610 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/icmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static __inline__ int opt_unrec(struct s
 	return (*op & 0xC0) == 0x80;
 }
 
-static int icmpv6_push_pending_frames(struct sock *sk, struct flowi *fl, struct icmp6hdr *thdr, int len)
+static int icmpv6_push_pending_frames(struct sock *sk, struct flowi *fl, struct icmp6hdr *thdr, int len, int cksum_needed)
 {
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	struct icmp6hdr *icmp6h;
@@ -223,7 +223,9 @@ static int icmpv6_push_pending_frames(st
 
 	icmp6h = (struct icmp6hdr*) skb->h.raw;
 	memcpy(icmp6h, thdr, sizeof(struct icmp6hdr));
-	icmp6h->icmp6_cksum = 0;
+
+	if (!cksum_needed)
+		goto sendit;
 
 	if (skb_queue_len(&sk->sk_write_queue) == 1) {
 		skb->csum = csum_partial((char *)icmp6h,
@@ -246,6 +248,7 @@ static int icmpv6_push_pending_frames(st
 					   len, fl->proto, tmp_csum);
 		icmp6h->icmp6_cksum = tmp_csum;
 	}
+sendit:
 	ip6_push_pending_frames(sk);
 out:
 	return err;
@@ -451,7 +454,7 @@ void icmpv6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, in
 		ip6_flush_pending_frames(sk);
 		goto out_put;
 	}
-	err = icmpv6_push_pending_frames(sk, &fl, &tmp_hdr, len + sizeof(struct icmp6hdr));
+	err = icmpv6_push_pending_frames(sk, &fl, &tmp_hdr, len + sizeof(struct icmp6hdr), 1);
 
 	if (type >= ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH && type <= ICMPV6_PARAMPROB)
 		ICMP6_INC_STATS_OFFSET_BH(idev, ICMP6_MIB_OUTDESTUNREACHS, type - ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH);
@@ -489,6 +492,14 @@ static void icmpv6_echo_reply(struct sk_
 	memcpy(&tmp_hdr, icmph, sizeof(tmp_hdr));
 	tmp_hdr.icmp6_type = ICMPV6_ECHO_REPLY;
 
+	/*
+	 * The only difference between echo requests and echo replies is the
+	 * ICMPv6 type value (which is a difference of 1).  So if we subtract
+	 * one from the request checksum, it will result in the correct
+	 * checksum for the reply.
+	 */
+	tmp_hdr.icmp6_cksum--;
+
 	memset(&fl, 0, sizeof(fl));
 	fl.proto = IPPROTO_ICMPV6;
 	ipv6_addr_copy(&fl.fl6_dst, &skb->nh.ipv6h->saddr);
@@ -540,7 +551,7 @@ static void icmpv6_echo_reply(struct sk_
 		ip6_flush_pending_frames(sk);
 		goto out_put;
 	}
-	err = icmpv6_push_pending_frames(sk, &fl, &tmp_hdr, skb->len + sizeof(struct icmp6hdr));
+	err = icmpv6_push_pending_frames(sk, &fl, &tmp_hdr, skb->len + sizeof(struct icmp6hdr), 0);
 
         ICMP6_INC_STATS_BH(idev, ICMP6_MIB_OUTECHOREPLIES);
         ICMP6_INC_STATS_BH(idev, ICMP6_MIB_OUTMSGS);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-11-10 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-08 22:13 why do we mangle checksums for v6 ICMP? Al Viro
2006-11-08 22:28 ` Al Viro
2006-11-09 17:32 ` Brian Haley
2006-11-09 23:14   ` David Miller
2006-11-10 16:24     ` [PATCH] IPv6: only modify checksum for UDP Brian Haley
2006-11-10 17:54       ` David Stevens
2006-11-14  0:50         ` David Miller
2006-11-14  1:18           ` Al Viro
2006-11-14  1:44           ` David Stevens
2006-11-14  1:52             ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 22:55       ` David Miller
2006-11-10 23:17         ` Nivedita Singhvi
2006-11-10 23:26           ` David Miller
2006-11-10 23:36             ` Nivedita Singhvi
2006-11-12  1:30             ` Brian Haley
2006-11-10 16:25     ` Brian Haley [this message]
2006-11-10 17:34       ` [PATCH] IPv6: optimize echo reply checksum calculation Al Viro
2006-11-10 17:51         ` Brian Haley
2006-11-10 18:05           ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 18:20             ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 19:04               ` Brian Haley
2006-11-10 19:17                 ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 21:06                   ` Brian Haley
2006-11-11  1:45                     ` Al Viro
2006-11-11 18:07     ` why do we mangle checksums for v6 ICMP? Bill Fink
2006-11-13  7:04       ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4554A811.5060402@hp.com \
    --to=brian.haley@hp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).