From: Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] IPv6: optimize echo reply checksum calculation
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:25:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4554A811.5060402@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061109.151402.15590179.davem@davemloft.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 269 bytes --]
Since the only difference between echo requests and echo replies is the
ICMPv6 type value (which is a difference of 1), just subtracting one
from the request checksum will result in the correct checksum for the reply.
Signed-off-by: Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com>
[-- Attachment #2: no.cksum.echo.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2414 bytes --]
diff --git a/net/ipv6/icmp.c b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
index dbb9b1f..ee04610 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/icmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static __inline__ int opt_unrec(struct s
return (*op & 0xC0) == 0x80;
}
-static int icmpv6_push_pending_frames(struct sock *sk, struct flowi *fl, struct icmp6hdr *thdr, int len)
+static int icmpv6_push_pending_frames(struct sock *sk, struct flowi *fl, struct icmp6hdr *thdr, int len, int cksum_needed)
{
struct sk_buff *skb;
struct icmp6hdr *icmp6h;
@@ -223,7 +223,9 @@ static int icmpv6_push_pending_frames(st
icmp6h = (struct icmp6hdr*) skb->h.raw;
memcpy(icmp6h, thdr, sizeof(struct icmp6hdr));
- icmp6h->icmp6_cksum = 0;
+
+ if (!cksum_needed)
+ goto sendit;
if (skb_queue_len(&sk->sk_write_queue) == 1) {
skb->csum = csum_partial((char *)icmp6h,
@@ -246,6 +248,7 @@ static int icmpv6_push_pending_frames(st
len, fl->proto, tmp_csum);
icmp6h->icmp6_cksum = tmp_csum;
}
+sendit:
ip6_push_pending_frames(sk);
out:
return err;
@@ -451,7 +454,7 @@ void icmpv6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, in
ip6_flush_pending_frames(sk);
goto out_put;
}
- err = icmpv6_push_pending_frames(sk, &fl, &tmp_hdr, len + sizeof(struct icmp6hdr));
+ err = icmpv6_push_pending_frames(sk, &fl, &tmp_hdr, len + sizeof(struct icmp6hdr), 1);
if (type >= ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH && type <= ICMPV6_PARAMPROB)
ICMP6_INC_STATS_OFFSET_BH(idev, ICMP6_MIB_OUTDESTUNREACHS, type - ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH);
@@ -489,6 +492,14 @@ static void icmpv6_echo_reply(struct sk_
memcpy(&tmp_hdr, icmph, sizeof(tmp_hdr));
tmp_hdr.icmp6_type = ICMPV6_ECHO_REPLY;
+ /*
+ * The only difference between echo requests and echo replies is the
+ * ICMPv6 type value (which is a difference of 1). So if we subtract
+ * one from the request checksum, it will result in the correct
+ * checksum for the reply.
+ */
+ tmp_hdr.icmp6_cksum--;
+
memset(&fl, 0, sizeof(fl));
fl.proto = IPPROTO_ICMPV6;
ipv6_addr_copy(&fl.fl6_dst, &skb->nh.ipv6h->saddr);
@@ -540,7 +551,7 @@ static void icmpv6_echo_reply(struct sk_
ip6_flush_pending_frames(sk);
goto out_put;
}
- err = icmpv6_push_pending_frames(sk, &fl, &tmp_hdr, skb->len + sizeof(struct icmp6hdr));
+ err = icmpv6_push_pending_frames(sk, &fl, &tmp_hdr, skb->len + sizeof(struct icmp6hdr), 0);
ICMP6_INC_STATS_BH(idev, ICMP6_MIB_OUTECHOREPLIES);
ICMP6_INC_STATS_BH(idev, ICMP6_MIB_OUTMSGS);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-10 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-08 22:13 why do we mangle checksums for v6 ICMP? Al Viro
2006-11-08 22:28 ` Al Viro
2006-11-09 17:32 ` Brian Haley
2006-11-09 23:14 ` David Miller
2006-11-10 16:24 ` [PATCH] IPv6: only modify checksum for UDP Brian Haley
2006-11-10 17:54 ` David Stevens
2006-11-14 0:50 ` David Miller
2006-11-14 1:18 ` Al Viro
2006-11-14 1:44 ` David Stevens
2006-11-14 1:52 ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 22:55 ` David Miller
2006-11-10 23:17 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2006-11-10 23:26 ` David Miller
2006-11-10 23:36 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2006-11-12 1:30 ` Brian Haley
2006-11-10 16:25 ` Brian Haley [this message]
2006-11-10 17:34 ` [PATCH] IPv6: optimize echo reply checksum calculation Al Viro
2006-11-10 17:51 ` Brian Haley
2006-11-10 18:05 ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 18:20 ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 19:04 ` Brian Haley
2006-11-10 19:17 ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 21:06 ` Brian Haley
2006-11-11 1:45 ` Al Viro
2006-11-11 18:07 ` why do we mangle checksums for v6 ICMP? Bill Fink
2006-11-13 7:04 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4554A811.5060402@hp.com \
--to=brian.haley@hp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).