From: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@us.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: brian.haley@hp.com, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: only modify checksum for UDP
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 15:17:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45550872.6050900@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061110.145507.112290147.davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller wrote:
> From: Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com>
> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:24:45 -0500
>
>> Only change upper-layer checksum from 0 to 0xFFFF for UDP (as RFC 768
>> states), not for others as RFC 4443 doesn't require it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com>
>
> Applied, thanks Brian.
Brian Haley wrote:
> Al Viro wrote:
>> Could you fscking read what you've replied to? Your -=1 will turn 0
>> into 0xffff instead of correct 0xfffe. IOW, it's broken in 1:65536
>> cases.
>
> I looked again at your previous email:
>
>> Note that even on little-endian you want
>> 3 -> 2
>> 2 -> 1
>> 1 -> 0xffff
>> 0 -> 0xfffe
>
> That doesn't look right to me, but I'll take your word that there's one
> edge case out there I don't see (even though this worked on Alpha).
> Forget about the patch then.
Er, given all of the above, Brian, could you share your test cases
and/or other/any information on testing this?
thanks,
Nivedita
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-10 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-08 22:13 why do we mangle checksums for v6 ICMP? Al Viro
2006-11-08 22:28 ` Al Viro
2006-11-09 17:32 ` Brian Haley
2006-11-09 23:14 ` David Miller
2006-11-10 16:24 ` [PATCH] IPv6: only modify checksum for UDP Brian Haley
2006-11-10 17:54 ` David Stevens
2006-11-14 0:50 ` David Miller
2006-11-14 1:18 ` Al Viro
2006-11-14 1:44 ` David Stevens
2006-11-14 1:52 ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 22:55 ` David Miller
2006-11-10 23:17 ` Nivedita Singhvi [this message]
2006-11-10 23:26 ` David Miller
2006-11-10 23:36 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2006-11-12 1:30 ` Brian Haley
2006-11-10 16:25 ` [PATCH] IPv6: optimize echo reply checksum calculation Brian Haley
2006-11-10 17:34 ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 17:51 ` Brian Haley
2006-11-10 18:05 ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 18:20 ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 19:04 ` Brian Haley
2006-11-10 19:17 ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 21:06 ` Brian Haley
2006-11-11 1:45 ` Al Viro
2006-11-11 18:07 ` why do we mangle checksums for v6 ICMP? Bill Fink
2006-11-13 7:04 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45550872.6050900@us.ibm.com \
--to=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=brian.haley@hp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).