netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@us.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: brian.haley@hp.com, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: only modify checksum for UDP
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 15:17:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45550872.6050900@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061110.145507.112290147.davem@davemloft.net>

David Miller wrote:
> From: Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com>
> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:24:45 -0500
> 
>> Only change upper-layer checksum from 0 to 0xFFFF for UDP (as RFC 768 
>> states), not for others as RFC 4443 doesn't require it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com>
> 
> Applied, thanks Brian.


Brian Haley wrote:
 > Al Viro wrote:
 >> Could you fscking read what you've replied to?  Your -=1 will turn 0
 >> into 0xffff instead of correct 0xfffe.  IOW, it's broken in 1:65536
 >> cases.
 >
 > I looked again at your previous email:
 >
 >> Note that even on little-endian you want
 >>     3 -> 2
 >>     2 -> 1
 >>     1 -> 0xffff
 >>     0 -> 0xfffe
 >
 > That doesn't look right to me, but I'll take your word that there's one
 > edge case out there I don't see (even though this worked on Alpha).
 > Forget about the patch then.

Er, given all of the above, Brian, could you share your test cases
and/or other/any information on testing this?

thanks,
Nivedita

  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-10 23:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-08 22:13 why do we mangle checksums for v6 ICMP? Al Viro
2006-11-08 22:28 ` Al Viro
2006-11-09 17:32 ` Brian Haley
2006-11-09 23:14   ` David Miller
2006-11-10 16:24     ` [PATCH] IPv6: only modify checksum for UDP Brian Haley
2006-11-10 17:54       ` David Stevens
2006-11-14  0:50         ` David Miller
2006-11-14  1:18           ` Al Viro
2006-11-14  1:44           ` David Stevens
2006-11-14  1:52             ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 22:55       ` David Miller
2006-11-10 23:17         ` Nivedita Singhvi [this message]
2006-11-10 23:26           ` David Miller
2006-11-10 23:36             ` Nivedita Singhvi
2006-11-12  1:30             ` Brian Haley
2006-11-10 16:25     ` [PATCH] IPv6: optimize echo reply checksum calculation Brian Haley
2006-11-10 17:34       ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 17:51         ` Brian Haley
2006-11-10 18:05           ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 18:20             ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 19:04               ` Brian Haley
2006-11-10 19:17                 ` Al Viro
2006-11-10 21:06                   ` Brian Haley
2006-11-11  1:45                     ` Al Viro
2006-11-11 18:07     ` why do we mangle checksums for v6 ICMP? Bill Fink
2006-11-13  7:04       ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45550872.6050900@us.ibm.com \
    --to=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=brian.haley@hp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).