From: Joshua Brindle <jbrindle@tresys.com>
To: Venkat Yekkirala <vyekkirala@TrustedCS.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, jmorris@namei.org,
sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] labeled-ipsec: Repost patchset with updates [Originally: mlsxfrm: Various Fixes]
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 11:22:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4555F8BB.30105@tresys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45526241.10805@trustedcs.com>
Venkat Yekkirala wrote:
> This patchset is against davem's net-2.6.git. Please apply to 2.6.19.
>
> The following are the changes since the previous post of this patchset:
>
> 1. Separate BUG_ON usage per Eric's suggestion.
>
> 2. Replace security_sid_compare with a simple sid compare check per
> a suggestion from Paul/Stephen.
>
I pulled in the lspp respin kernels and am checking the labeling
behavior now so I should have a full response later, however I ran into
one unexpected thing immediately on bootup with the new kernel:
audit(1163061323.188:197): avc: denied { send } for pid=1676
comm="modprobe" daddr=ff02:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0016 netif=eth0
scontext=system_u:system_r:kernel_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 tclass=packet
audit(1163061343.335:204): avc: denied { send } for pid=1804
comm="avahi-daemon" saddr=fe80:0000:0000:0000:020c:29ff:fe72:2dd1
src=5353 daddr=ff02:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:00fb dest=5353
netif=eth0 scontext=system_u:system_r:avahi_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 tclass=packet
audit(1163061343.338:205): avc: denied { recv } for pid=1804
comm="avahi-daemon" saddr=fe80:0000:0000:0000:020c:29ff:fe72:2dd1
src=5353 daddr=ff02:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:00fb dest=5353
netif=eth0 scontext=system_u:system_r:avahi_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 tclass=packet
audit(1163061346.139:210): avc: denied { send } for pid=1856
comm="smartd-conf.py" saddr=fe80:0000:0000:0000:020c:29ff:fe72:2dd1
daddr=ff02:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0016 netif=eth0
scontext=system_u:system_r:kernel_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 tclass=packet
These denials come after iptables-restore sets up labeling in the mangle
table so I'm not sure why they are unlabeled.. They also don't say which
port they were using, perhaps is it a different protocol that our packet
labeling isn't covering yet? Is there any way we could get protocol
information in the denial?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-11 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-08 23:03 [PATCH 0/3] labeled-ipsec: Repost patchset with updates [Originally: mlsxfrm: Various Fixes] Venkat Yekkirala
2006-11-09 6:30 ` James Morris
2006-11-09 6:42 ` David Miller
2006-11-09 14:14 ` Venkat Yekkirala
2006-11-11 16:22 ` Joshua Brindle [this message]
2006-11-13 15:42 ` Venkat Yekkirala
2006-11-13 17:45 ` Joshua Brindle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4555F8BB.30105@tresys.com \
--to=jbrindle@tresys.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=vyekkirala@TrustedCS.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).