From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Larry Finger Subject: Re: bcm43xx regression 2.6.19rc3 -> rc5, rtnl_lock trouble? Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 20:51:05 -0600 Message-ID: <455BD219.8080104@lwfinger.net> References: <455B63EC.8070704@madrabbit.org> <200611152015.07844.mb@bu3sch.de> <455B6D74.2020507@madrabbit.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrew Morton , netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, John Linville , LKML , Michael Buesch , Bcm43xx-dev-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org Return-path: To: Ray Lee In-Reply-To: <455B6D74.2020507-0Cg02Ec9UG4BXFe83j6qeQ@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: bcm43xx-dev-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org Errors-To: bcm43xx-dev-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Ray Lee wrote: > Michael Buesch wrote: >> On Wednesday 15 November 2006 20:01, Ray Lee wrote: >>> Suggestions? Requests for even more info? >> Yeah, enable bcm43xx debugging. > > Sigh, didn't even think to look for that. Okay, enabled and compiling a new > kernel. This will take a few days to trigger, if the pattern holds, so in the > meantime, any *other* thoughts? > Which chip and revision do you have? Send me your equivalent of the line "bcm43xx: Chip ID 0x4306, rev 0x2". Thanks, Larry