From: Daniel Drake <dsd-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Stefano Brivio <st3-sGOZH3hwPm2sTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>,
John Linville <linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>,
Michael Buesch <mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>,
Bcm43xx-dev-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org,
Larry Finger
<Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] softmac: remove netif_tx_disable when scanning
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:37:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4569C2D0.8080406@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1164535408.21459.3.camel-YfaajirXv214zXjbi5bjpg@public.gmane.org>
Johannes Berg wrote:
> The problem is that queue disabling isn't refcounted so that a scan that
> collides with bcm43xx having disabled the queue for calibration might
> re-enable the queue while bcm43xx is still calibrating.
I agree with that part. However the other reason for the patch (transmit
queue needed for active scanning) is bogus, and the patch introduces a
problem where session frames may be transmitted during scanning (using
TX queue control avoids that problem).
> Clearly, this doesn't fully fix the problem because softmac will try to
> transmit frames during the calibration. Hence, a proper fix would be to
> not remove the calls to netif_tx_disable but make them go through
> softmac (ieee80211_tx_disable) to make sure that softmac doesn't try to
> scan while the queues are disabled, which would fix the aforementioned
> problem of softmac enabling the queue while the driver needs it disabled
> for free.
Stack-level refcounted TX control like this would also be beneficial for
zd1211rw, currently we have a semi-ugly implementation inside the driver.
> Also, for bcm43xx this isn't a problem since the firmware (optionally
> but we use that afaik) takes care of not transmitting frames that are
> tagged for a different channel than currently tuned to.
zd1211 has no such functionality :(
Michael Buesch wrote:
> Softmac ignoring
> this queue-disabled flag is just yet another bug.
Agreed, but this one isn't going to be fixed any time soon. This was the
first point I raised against softmac during early zd1211rw development a
long while back.
I agree with the objectives of this patch but the way I see it is that
it trades one bug for another. A proper solution, as suggested by
Johannes (refcounted stack-level TX control) would not be hard to
implement and would solve the bug without introducing another.
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-26 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-26 0:16 [PATCH] softmac: remove netif_tx_disable when scanning Larry Finger
2006-11-26 4:05 ` Daniel Drake
2006-11-26 10:03 ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-26 12:12 ` Michael Buesch
[not found] ` <200611261312.20442.mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2006-11-26 13:05 ` Larry Finger
[not found] ` <4569912C.1000506-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2006-11-26 13:06 ` Michael Buesch
[not found] ` <1164535408.21459.3.camel-YfaajirXv214zXjbi5bjpg@public.gmane.org>
2006-11-26 16:37 ` Daniel Drake [this message]
2006-11-26 16:51 ` Johannes Berg
[not found] ` <1164559882.22909.5.camel-YfaajirXv214zXjbi5bjpg@public.gmane.org>
2006-11-26 18:25 ` Daniel Drake
2006-11-26 18:40 ` Johannes Berg
[not found] ` <1164566436.22909.26.camel-YfaajirXv214zXjbi5bjpg@public.gmane.org>
2006-11-26 19:03 ` Larry Finger
2006-11-27 4:13 ` Daniel Drake
2006-11-27 15:49 ` Michael Buesch
[not found] ` <45691273.9090803-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2006-11-26 10:07 ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-26 12:25 ` Michael Buesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4569C2D0.8080406@gentoo.org \
--to=dsd-abrp7r+bbdudnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Bcm43xx-dev-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=st3-sGOZH3hwPm2sTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).