* [PATCH 0/5 addendum] NetXen
@ 2006-11-30 18:56 Don Fry
2006-12-01 0:15 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Don Fry @ 2006-11-30 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: amitkale, jeff, netxenproj, rob, sanjeev, wendyx
The NetXen patches fix many problems in the current #upstream version of
the driver. It has warts and probably lots of bugs still, but it is
better than what is queued for mainline inclusion at this time. Please
apply to 2.6.20.
--
Don Fry
brazilnut@us.ibm.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/5 addendum] NetXen
2006-11-30 18:56 [PATCH 0/5 addendum] NetXen Don Fry
@ 2006-12-01 0:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-12-01 0:27 ` Don Fry
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2006-12-01 0:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Don Fry; +Cc: netdev, amitkale, netxenproj, rob, sanjeev, wendyx
Don Fry wrote:
> The NetXen patches fix many problems in the current #upstream version of
> the driver. It has warts and probably lots of bugs still, but it is
> better than what is queued for mainline inclusion at this time. Please
> apply to 2.6.20.
Please resync with netdev#upstream, and update for comments on netdev...
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/5 addendum] NetXen
2006-12-01 0:15 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2006-12-01 0:27 ` Don Fry
2006-12-01 1:31 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Don Fry @ 2006-12-01 0:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: netdev, amitkale, netxenproj, rob, sanjeev, wendyx
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 07:15:50PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Don Fry wrote:
> >The NetXen patches fix many problems in the current #upstream version of
> >the driver. It has warts and probably lots of bugs still, but it is
> >better than what is queued for mainline inclusion at this time. Please
> >apply to 2.6.20.
>
> Please resync with netdev#upstream, and update for comments on netdev...
>
> Jeff
I think I am up to date with netdev#upstream. Maybe I am pointed at the
wrong place. Is the correct git tree at?
http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git/
and then to get to the upstream branch I do
git-checkout upstream
--
Don Fry
brazilnut@us.ibm.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/5 addendum] NetXen
2006-12-01 0:27 ` Don Fry
@ 2006-12-01 1:31 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2006-12-01 1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Don Fry; +Cc: netdev, amitkale, netxenproj, rob, sanjeev, wendyx
Don Fry wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 07:15:50PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Don Fry wrote:
>>> The NetXen patches fix many problems in the current #upstream version of
>>> the driver. It has warts and probably lots of bugs still, but it is
>>> better than what is queued for mainline inclusion at this time. Please
>>> apply to 2.6.20.
>> Please resync with netdev#upstream, and update for comments on netdev...
>>
>> Jeff
>
> I think I am up to date with netdev#upstream. Maybe I am pointed at the
> wrong place. Is the correct git tree at?
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git/
>
> and then to get to the upstream branch I do
> git-checkout upstream
That's the one. The key is making sure you have the top-of-tree, it
might not have mirrored out yet.
$ cat netdev-2.6/.git/refs/heads/upstream
5e3f6b98b639c611c45751081c59ae9a04081964
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-12-01 1:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-11-30 18:56 [PATCH 0/5 addendum] NetXen Don Fry
2006-12-01 0:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-12-01 0:27 ` Don Fry
2006-12-01 1:31 ` Jeff Garzik
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).