From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [XFRM] Optimize SA dumping Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 13:36:27 +0100 Message-ID: <4574164B.1000505@trash.net> References: <1165163610.3517.96.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:30123 "EHLO stinky.trash.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936265AbWLDMdU (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2006 07:33:20 -0500 To: hadi@cyberus.ca In-Reply-To: <1165163610.3517.96.camel@localhost> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org jamal wrote: > for (i = 0; i <= xfrm_state_hmask; i++) { > hlist_for_each_entry(x, entry, xfrm_state_bydst+i, bydst) { > + if (count && send_x != last_x) { > + err = func(send_x, count, data); > + if (err) > + goto out; > + send_x = NULL; > + } > if (!xfrm_id_proto_match(x->id.proto, proto)) > continue; After you sent send_x and set it to NULL, it will be different from last_x (since that is != NULL) and the NULL pointer will be given to func() when continuing here. > - err = func(x, --count, data); > - if (err) > - goto out; > + > + if (!count) { > + last_x = send_x = x; > + } else { > + send_x = last_x; > + last_x = x; > + } > + count++; > } > }