From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Drake Subject: Re: d80211-drivers updated (zd1211rw-d80211 synced with zd1211rw) Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 09:03:50 -0500 Message-ID: <45742AC6.90408@gentoo.org> References: <200612040250.43955.flamingice@sourmilk.net> <20061204125139.GA10912@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Michael Wu , Ulrich Kunitz , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from smtp151.iad.emailsrvr.com ([207.97.245.151]:53130 "EHLO smtp151.iad.emailsrvr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936875AbWLDOL5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2006 09:11:57 -0500 To: "John W. Linville" In-Reply-To: <20061204125139.GA10912@tuxdriver.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org John W. Linville wrote: > Similarly, I would prefer for Ulrich or Daniel to maintain the zd1211rw > git tree unless you (i.e. Michael) are going to be one of the primary > authors going forward. OK. Myself and Ulrich have discussed this, we are going to create our own git trees for zd1211rw-d80211. The attraction of sending pull requests to Michael is that he should be able to merge patches and push out updated trees quicker. If the turnaround is quicker here it would really mean we could stop having to maintain our own git stuff and simply use the upstream tree as the base. However, this isn't really a big deal: Ulrich wants to use git regardless, and I'm still the patch monkey, so I will continue using git as well (regardless of upstream merge time turnaround). Daniel