netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Gifford <maillist@jg555.com>
To: Stefan Rompf <stefan@loplof.de>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	  dwmw2@infradead.org, joseph@codesourcery.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,   libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
	akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [NETLINK]: Restore API compatibility of address and neighbour   bits
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:33:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4579A1FE.1040200@jg555.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200612081526.12651.stefan@loplof.de>

I have seen issues with some version of unifdef remove any instance of 
__KERNEL__, is the #ifndef __KERNEL__ really necessary. Has anyone 
tested to make sure the install_headers will not accidently remove this?

  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-08 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-06 17:20 Kernel header changes break glibc build Joseph S. Myers
2006-12-03 12:25 ` David Woodhouse
2006-12-04  9:13   ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-06 13:01     ` David Woodhouse
2006-12-06 13:43       ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-12-06 13:51         ` David Woodhouse
2006-12-06 13:57           ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-12-06 14:01             ` David Woodhouse
2006-12-06 13:59         ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-06 14:07           ` David Woodhouse
2006-12-06 14:18             ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-12-06 14:31               ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-06 17:13                 ` Al Viro
2006-12-06 20:26                   ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-06 20:34                     ` Al Viro
2006-12-06 21:35                       ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-06 14:23             ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-07 11:29               ` David Woodhouse
2006-12-06 19:32     ` Stefan Rompf
2006-12-06 20:22       ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-07  0:56       ` David Miller
2006-12-07 10:47         ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-07 10:51           ` David Miller
2006-12-07 10:55             ` [NETLINK]: Restore API compatibility of address and neighbour bits Thomas Graf
2006-12-07 11:28               ` David Woodhouse
2006-12-08  7:52                 ` David Miller
2006-12-08  7:50               ` David Miller
2006-12-08 14:25               ` Stefan Rompf
2006-12-08 17:33                 ` Jim Gifford [this message]
2006-12-08 17:54                   ` Mike Frysinger
2006-12-08 21:33                 ` David Miller
2006-12-08 21:36                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-08 21:47                     ` David Miller
2006-12-08 21:52                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-09  0:43                         ` David Miller
2006-12-09  1:14                           ` David Miller
2006-12-09 10:39                             ` [NETLINK]: Schedule removal of old macros exported to userspace Thomas Graf
2006-12-09 11:49                               ` Stefan Rompf
2006-12-09 12:55                                 ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-09 14:58                                   ` Stefan Rompf
2006-12-09 21:50                                     ` David Miller
2006-12-09 22:02                                     ` David Woodhouse
2006-12-12 11:23                                     ` David Woodhouse
2006-12-09 21:49                                   ` David Miller
2006-12-09 21:45                               ` David Miller
2006-12-09 23:28                                 ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-10 10:11                                   ` Stefan Rompf
2006-12-10 12:15                                     ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-12  6:56                                       ` dhcpclient netlink bugs (was Re: [NETLINK]: Schedule removal of old macros exported to userspace) Stefan Rompf
2006-12-15  0:46                                         ` Herbert Xu
2006-12-10  1:42                                 ` [NETLINK]: Schedule removal of old macros exported to userspace Jeff Bailey
2006-12-10  1:52                                   ` Al Viro
2006-12-09  9:56                   ` [NETLINK]: Restore API compatibility of address and neighbour bits Stefan Rompf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4579A1FE.1040200@jg555.com \
    --to=maillist@jg555.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefan@loplof.de \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).