netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Finger <larry.finger@lwfinger.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Ulrich Kunitz <kune@deine-taler.de>,
	Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	dsd@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ieee80211softmac: Fix errors related to the work_struct changes
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:34:15 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <457D9697.4090206@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061210104056.572db071.akpm@osdl.org>

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:35:36 +0100
> Ulrich Kunitz <kune@deine-taler.de> wrote:
> 
>> The problem is that you there are now different work structures:
>> struct work_struct and struct delayed_work. The quick fix seems to
>> have been to change all old work_structs as associnfo's work to
>> delayed_work. The way the structures are designed calling
>> schedule_work or schedule_delayed_work doesn't matter, but you
>> will get a gcc warning, because the pointer types are not
>> identical. This change works around the warning in the same way as
>> the other schedule_work calls for associnfo's work.
> 
> David proposed the below.  Does it fix things for you?
> 
> --- a/net/ieee80211/softmac/ieee80211softmac_assoc.c~workstruct-fix-ieee80211-softmac-compile-problem
> +++ a/net/ieee80211/softmac/ieee80211softmac_assoc.c
> @@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ ieee80211softmac_try_reassoc(struct ieee
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&mac->lock, flags);
>  	mac->associnfo.associating = 1;
> -	schedule_work(&mac->associnfo.work);
> +	schedule_delayed_work(&mac->associnfo.work, 0);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mac->lock, flags);
>  }
>  
> _
> 
>> I'm not sure, whether the breaking of the workqueue API is really
>> worth it. What I see is that the change introduced choices and
>> choices make things more complex.
> 
> It is kinda sucky.  But it saves a bit of space in kernel data structures.

The above patch fixes a compile problem; however, the code still hangs when the network is started.
You need two additional hunks as shown below.

Larry
=========================================================================

From: Ulrich Kunitz <kune@deine-taler.de>

The signature of work functions changed recently from a context
pointer to the work structure pointer. This caused a problem in
the ieee80211softmac code, because the ieee80211softmac_assoc_work
function has  been called directly with a parameter explicitly
casted to (void*). This compiled correctly but resulted in a
softlock, because mutex_lock was called with the wrong memory
address. The patch fixes the problem. Another issue was a wrong
call of the schedule_work function. Softmac works again and this
fixes the problem I mentioned earlier in the zd1211rw rx tasklet
patch. The patch is against Linus' tree (commit af1713e0).

Signed-off-by: Ulrich Kunitz <kune@deine-taler.de>
Acked-by: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
---

diff --git a/net/ieee80211/softmac/ieee80211softmac_assoc.c 
b/net/ieee80211/softmac/ieee80211softmac_assoc.c
index eec1a1d..a824852 100644
--- a/net/ieee80211/softmac/ieee80211softmac_assoc.c
+++ b/net/ieee80211/softmac/ieee80211softmac_assoc.c
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static void
  ieee80211softmac_assoc_notify_scan(struct net_device *dev, int event_type, void *context)
  {
  	struct ieee80211softmac_device *mac = ieee80211_priv(dev);
-	ieee80211softmac_assoc_work((void*)mac);
+	ieee80211softmac_assoc_work(&mac->associnfo.work.work);
  }

  static void
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ ieee80211softmac_assoc_notify_auth(struc

  	switch (event_type) {
  	case IEEE80211SOFTMAC_EVENT_AUTHENTICATED:
-		ieee80211softmac_assoc_work((void*)mac);
+		ieee80211softmac_assoc_work(&mac->associnfo.work.work);
  		break;
  	case IEEE80211SOFTMAC_EVENT_AUTH_FAILED:
  	case IEEE80211SOFTMAC_EVENT_AUTH_TIMEOUT:

  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-11 17:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-10 17:39 [PATCH] ieee80211softmac: Fix errors related to the work_struct changes Ulrich Kunitz
2006-12-10 17:49 ` Michael Buesch
2006-12-10 18:35   ` Ulrich Kunitz
2006-12-10 18:40     ` Michael Buesch
2006-12-10 18:40     ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-11 17:34       ` Larry Finger [this message]
2006-12-11  4:24 ` Larry Finger
2006-12-11 21:49   ` John W. Linville

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=457D9697.4090206@lwfinger.net \
    --to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=kune@deine-taler.de \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).