From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [take26-resend1 0/8] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism. Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:39:33 -0500 Message-ID: <457EB115.3020407@garzik.org> References: <1165848619971@2ka.mipt.ru> <457D764E.9040308@garzik.org> <20061212053902.GC14420@2ka.mipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , Ulrich Drepper , Andrew Morton , netdev , Zach Brown , Christoph Hellwig , Chase Venters , Johann Borck , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:55574 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751336AbWLLNjr (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:39:47 -0500 To: Evgeniy Polyakov In-Reply-To: <20061212053902.GC14420@2ka.mipt.ru> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 10:16:30AM -0500, Jeff Garzik (jeff@garzik.org) wrote: >> Comments: >> >> * [oh, everybody will hate me for saying this, but...] to me, "kevent" >> implies an internal kernel subsystem. I would rather call it "uevent" >> or anything else lacking a 'k' prefix. > > It is kernel subsystem indeed, which exports some of its part to > userspace. > I previously thought that prefix 'k' can only be confused with KDE. It is a true statement to say "without the kevent subsystem, userspace lacks uevent handling". And let's be honest, the main consumers of this will be userspace apps, and a few in-kernel users pretending to be userspace apps (kernel threads). Jeff