From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks)
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:13:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45889C53.8000307@candelatech.com> (raw)
This is from 2.6.18.2 kernel with my patch set. The MAC-VLANs are in active use.
From the backtrace, I am thinking this might be a generic problem, however.
Any ideas about what this could be? It seems to be reproducible every day or
two, but no known way to make it happen quickly...
Kernel is SMP, PREEMPT.
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<78104252>] show_trace+0x12/0x20
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<78104929>] dump_stack+0x19/0x20
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<7814c88b>] softlockup_tick+0x9b/0xd0
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<7812a992>] run_local_timers+0x12/0x20
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<7812ac08>] update_process_times+0x38/0x80
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<78112796>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x66/0x70
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<78103baa>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x2a/0x30
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<78354e8c>] _read_lock+0x3c/0x50
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<78331f42>] ip_check_mc+0x22/0xb0
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<783068bf>] ip_route_input+0x17f/0xef0
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<78309c59>] ip_rcv+0x349/0x580
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<782ec98d>] netif_receive_skb+0x36d/0x3b0
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<782ee50c>] process_backlog+0x9c/0x130
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<782ee795>] net_rx_action+0xc5/0x1f0
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<78125e58>] __do_softirq+0x88/0x110
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<78125f59>] do_softirq+0x79/0x80
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<781260ed>] irq_exit+0x5d/0x60
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<78105a6d>] do_IRQ+0x4d/0xa0
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<78103ae9>] common_interrupt+0x25/0x2c
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<78354c45>] _spin_lock+0x35/0x50
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<781aab1d>] proc_register+0x2d/0x110
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<781ab23d>] create_proc_entry+0x5d/0xd0
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<7812873b>] register_proc_table+0x6b/0x110
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<78128771>] register_proc_table+0xa1/0x110
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost last message repeated 3 times
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<7812886d>] register_sysctl_table+0x8d/0xc0
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<7832f0c9>] devinet_sysctl_register+0x109/0x150
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<7832f2ea>] inetdev_init+0xea/0x160
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<7832fa2e>] inet_rtm_newaddr+0x16e/0x190
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<782f58a9>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x169/0x230
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<78300ed0>] netlink_run_queue+0x90/0x140
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<782f56dc>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x2c/0x50
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<783014a5>] netlink_data_ready+0x15/0x60
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<78300167>] netlink_sendskb+0x27/0x50
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<78300bab>] netlink_unicast+0x15b/0x1f0
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<783013ab>] netlink_sendmsg+0x20b/0x2f0
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<782e12bc>] sock_sendmsg+0xfc/0x120
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<782e1a5a>] sys_sendmsg+0x10a/0x220
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<782e3311>] sys_socketcall+0x261/0x290
Dec 19 04:49:33 localhost kernel: [<7810307d>] sysenter_past_esp+0x56/0x8d
Dec 19 04:52:17 localhost sshd[32311]: gethostby*.getanswer: asked for "203.60.60.10.in-addr.arpa IN PTR", got type "A"
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next reply other threads:[~2006-12-20 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-20 2:13 Ben Greear [this message]
2006-12-22 7:13 ` [PATCH] igmp: spin_lock_bh in timer (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!) Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22 7:42 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22 13:47 ` Ben Greear
2006-12-22 14:05 ` Ben Greear
2006-12-27 8:24 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-27 16:16 ` Ben Greear
2006-12-28 12:56 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-29 11:16 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22 9:48 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22 11:16 ` Herbert Xu
2006-12-22 12:53 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02 5:00 ` BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks) Ben Greear
2007-01-02 7:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02 8:23 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02 9:23 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02 23:35 ` David Stevens
2007-01-02 23:43 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-03 8:07 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-03 8:28 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-03 16:53 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-03 22:14 ` David Stevens
2007-01-03 23:13 ` David Stevens
2007-01-03 23:35 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-03 23:56 ` David Stevens
2007-01-04 0:30 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 1:02 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-04 1:14 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 5:41 ` David Stevens
2007-01-04 5:34 ` David Stevens
2007-01-04 6:26 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 8:03 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04 8:29 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 8:50 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04 10:27 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 11:04 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04 17:04 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-05 13:55 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04 20:33 ` David Miller
2007-01-05 6:38 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-05 9:38 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-05 11:19 ` [PATCH] devinet: inetdev_init out label moved after RCU assignment Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-05 11:23 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-05 11:37 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-09 22:38 ` David Miller
2007-01-05 19:52 ` David Stevens
2007-01-05 20:33 ` BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks) Ben Greear
2007-01-05 20:34 ` David Miller
2007-01-08 6:53 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-08 16:57 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-08 18:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-01-09 8:10 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-10 9:04 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-10 12:50 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-10 20:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-01-11 7:24 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11 7:40 ` David Miller
2007-01-11 8:29 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11 8:35 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11 8:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11 9:27 ` David Miller
2007-01-11 11:09 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11 17:42 ` RCU info Stephen Hemminger
2007-01-12 12:19 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45889C53.8000307@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).