From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] igmp: spin_lock_bh in timer (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!)
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 08:16:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45929C4A.5000008@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061227082400.GA2070@ff.dom.local>
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 06:05:18AM -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
>> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 08:13:08AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>>>> On 20-12-2006 03:13, Ben Greear wrote:
>>>>> This is from 2.6.18.2 kernel with my patch set. The MAC-VLANs are in
>>>>> active use.
>>>>> From the backtrace, I am thinking this might be a generic problem,
>>>>> however.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any ideas about what this could be? It seems to be reproducible every
>>>>> day or
>>> ...
>>>> If it doesn't help, I hope lockdep will be more
>>>> precise when you'll upgrade to 2.6.19 or higher.
>>> ... or when you enable lockdep in 2.6.18 (I've
>>> forgotten it's there alredy!).
>> I got lucky..the system was available by ssh still. I see this in the boot
>> logs..I assume
>> this means lockdep is enabled? Should I have expected to see a lockdep
>> trace in the case of
>> his soft-lockup then?
>>
>> .....
>> Dec 19 04:33:48 localhost kernel: Lock dependency validator: Copyright (c)
>> 2006 Red Hat, Inc., Ingo MolnarDec 19 04:33:48 localhost kernel: ...
>> MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES: 8
>
> Yes, you got it enabled in the config.
>
> If there is no message later about validator
> turning off and no warnings which could point
> at lockdep then it is working.
>
> But then, IMHO, there is rather small probability
> this bug is really from lockup. Another possibility
> is hardware irqs (timer in particular) are turned
> off by something (maybe those hacks?) for extremely
> long time (~10 sec.).
The system hangs and does not recover (well, a few processes
continue on the other processor for a few minutes before they
too deadlock...)
I am guessing this problem has been around for a while, but it
is only triggered when interfaces are created, and probably only
when UDP traffic is already running heavily on the system. Most
systems w/out virtual devices will not trigger this sort of
race.
Ben
>
> Regards,
> Jarek P.
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-27 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-20 2:13 BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks) Ben Greear
2006-12-22 7:13 ` [PATCH] igmp: spin_lock_bh in timer (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!) Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22 7:42 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22 13:47 ` Ben Greear
2006-12-22 14:05 ` Ben Greear
2006-12-27 8:24 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-27 16:16 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2006-12-28 12:56 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-29 11:16 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22 9:48 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22 11:16 ` Herbert Xu
2006-12-22 12:53 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02 5:00 ` BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks) Ben Greear
2007-01-02 7:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02 8:23 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02 9:23 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02 23:35 ` David Stevens
2007-01-02 23:43 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-03 8:07 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-03 8:28 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-03 16:53 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-03 22:14 ` David Stevens
2007-01-03 23:13 ` David Stevens
2007-01-03 23:35 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-03 23:56 ` David Stevens
2007-01-04 0:30 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 1:02 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-04 1:14 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 5:41 ` David Stevens
2007-01-04 5:34 ` David Stevens
2007-01-04 6:26 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 8:03 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04 8:29 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 8:50 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04 10:27 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 11:04 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04 17:04 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-05 13:55 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04 20:33 ` David Miller
2007-01-05 6:38 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-05 9:38 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-05 11:19 ` [PATCH] devinet: inetdev_init out label moved after RCU assignment Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-05 11:23 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-05 11:37 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-09 22:38 ` David Miller
2007-01-05 19:52 ` David Stevens
2007-01-05 20:33 ` BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks) Ben Greear
2007-01-05 20:34 ` David Miller
2007-01-08 6:53 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-08 16:57 ` Ben Greear
2007-01-08 18:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-01-09 8:10 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-10 9:04 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-10 12:50 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-10 20:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-01-11 7:24 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11 7:40 ` David Miller
2007-01-11 8:29 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11 8:35 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11 8:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11 9:27 ` David Miller
2007-01-11 11:09 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11 17:42 ` RCU info Stephen Hemminger
2007-01-12 12:19 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45929C4A.5000008@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).