netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rare bad TCP checksum with 2.6.19?
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:25:37 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45AB8EE1.2010603@tls.msk.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45AB82F1.9000409@tls.msk.ru>

Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
> And another thing I noticed.  Right now I'm experimenting with another
> machine, running 2.6.17(.13) - it also shows similar behavior with bad
> csums, but MUCH rarer than this 2.6.19.  Like this:
> 
> 16:29:32.490976 IP (tos 0x60, ttl  48, id 14110, offset 0, flags [DF], length: 80)
>  69.42.67.34.2612 > 81.13.94.6.1234: . [bad tcp cksum f4b4 (->c1cc)!] ack 93407 win 9821
>  <nop,nop,timestamp 1046528199 5497679,nop,nop,sack sack 3 {104991:109335}{110783:112231}{104991:109335} >

This seems to be a tcpdump bug.  At least the same packet(s), on another machine
(in-between the two), with updated tcpdump, shows as having correct checksum.
After updating tcpdump on this machine, I'm not seeing this 'sack bad cksum'
stuff anymore.

/mjt

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-15 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-14 22:59 rare bad TCP checksum with 2.6.19? Michael Tokarev
2007-01-15  9:39 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-15 13:34   ` Michael Tokarev
2007-01-15 14:25     ` Michael Tokarev [this message]
2007-01-15 18:13     ` Eric Dumazet
2007-01-15 19:33       ` Michael Tokarev
2007-01-15 23:36         ` Eric Dumazet
2007-01-15 20:10     ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-15 21:46       ` Michael Tokarev
2007-01-15 23:35         ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-16  3:27         ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-16  3:38           ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-16  8:08             ` Michael Tokarev
2007-01-16 11:50               ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-16 12:15                 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-16 14:38                   ` Michael Tokarev
2007-01-17 14:12                 ` Michael Tokarev
2007-01-19 11:06                   ` [PATCH] tcp_output: " Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-19 12:14                     ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-19 13:23                       ` Michael Tokarev
2007-01-19 14:32                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-19 13:20                     ` Michael Tokarev
2007-01-19 14:08                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-22  7:13                         ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-22  7:19                           ` Michael Tokarev
2007-01-22  8:03                             ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-19 21:10                     ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-22  6:52                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-22  7:45                         ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-22  8:48                           ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-22 13:46                           ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-24  6:08                         ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45AB8EE1.2010603@tls.msk.ru \
    --to=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).