From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] atl1: Ancillary C files for Attansic L1 driver Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:33:29 -0500 Message-ID: <45B67F29.4010703@garzik.org> References: <20070121210737.GE2702@osprey.hogchain.net> <20070121183151.4be61ebf.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <45B43093.6060500@bellsouth.net> <20070122200004.GA12553@dreamland.darkstar.lan> <20070123112522.65aac61b@freekitty> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Luca Tettamanti , Jay Cliburn , Randy Dunlap , shemminger@osdl.org, csnook@redhat.com, hch@infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, atl1-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:50954 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965467AbXAWVdi (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:33:38 -0500 To: Stephen Hemminger In-Reply-To: <20070123112522.65aac61b@freekitty> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Stephen Hemminger wrote: > IMHO the MSI disabling should be removed from drivers and be done > in the PCI core. That is the consensus opinion. Currently drivers implement the MSI tests because the core PCI code hasn't been up to snuff. I (and others) have been discouraging that, but when a user faces a choice between working and non-working network, the pragmatic solution wins. All efforts to get us to the point where we can remove the MSI tests from drivers are strongly supported... Jeff