From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>,
Jay Cliburn <jacliburn@bellsouth.net>,
shemminger@osdl.org, csnook@redhat.com, hch@infradead.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
atl1-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] atl1: Ancillary C files for Attansic L1 driver
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:06:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45B686EB.60508@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45B68249.90507@oracle.com>
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:33:29 -0500
>> Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>>> IMHO the MSI disabling should be removed from drivers and be done
>>>> in the PCI core.
>>> That is the consensus opinion.
>>>
>>> Currently drivers implement the MSI tests because the core PCI code
>>> hasn't been up to snuff. I (and others) have been discouraging that,
>>> but when a user faces a choice between working and non-working
>>> network, the pragmatic solution wins.
>
> Linus's remark (IIRC) was to not enable CONFIG_PCI_MSI then.
Most distros, especially cutting edge ones like Fedora, will enable
CONFIG_PCI_MSI.
>>> All efforts to get us to the point where we can remove the MSI tests
>>> from drivers are strongly supported...
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>
>> So far, either MSI works for all devices or is broken, so it makes
>> sense to have a "msi=off" boot option (if there isn't already)
>>
> There is one, but it's spelled "pci=nomsi".
Yep. Thanks for repeating this, and refreshing the collective memory.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-23 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-21 21:07 [PATCH 4/4] atl1: Ancillary C files for Attansic L1 driver Jay Cliburn
2007-01-22 2:31 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-01-22 3:33 ` Jay Cliburn
2007-01-22 20:00 ` Luca Tettamanti
2007-01-23 19:25 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-01-23 21:19 ` Luca Tettamanti
2007-01-27 21:02 ` Jay Cliburn
2007-01-27 21:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-01-27 22:05 ` Jay Cliburn
2007-01-27 22:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-01-23 21:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-01-23 21:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-01-23 21:46 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-01-23 22:06 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-01-11 0:43 Jay Cliburn
2007-01-11 9:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-01-19 3:00 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-11-19 20:31 Jay Cliburn
2006-11-20 12:40 ` Chris Snook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45B686EB.60508@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=atl1-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=csnook@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jacliburn@bellsouth.net \
--cc=kronos.it@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).