From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
To: Steve Hill <steve.hill@dialogic.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net,
Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Lksctp-developers] Fw: Intermittent SCTP multihoming breakage
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 16:48:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45C8F7BA.6010007@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E096369D937D3A4DB271B382850C5C5F48E60D@pysmail.eicon.com>
Steve Hill wrote:
> Vlad Yasevich wrote on 05 February 2007 20:35:
>
>> would you mind terribly, changing the -d "$net" to the
>> -i "$net", and run the script with the interface name instead?
>
> I seem to get the same failure when dropping traffic based on interface
> as I do when dropping based on address.
Hmm... can you try with a more recent sender please. Running 2.6.19 or
2.6.20 with my patch, I don't see this problem when a single interface fails.
I see a full path failover withing the 5 second timeout of the table rule.
Once failover happens, the traffic is using the second interface.
I haven't tried forcing the failover back to the first one, but I can
try flip-flopping them and see what happens.
>
>> When I block at the ip address, I see the path failover
>> in an odd state. It looks like it happened, but the flow is
>> not resumed. Receive still doesn't get traffic. I think I might
>
> This sounds like it might be the same problem I'm seeing.
>
> My sender is running the 2.6.16.1 kernel with your patch applied, the
> receiver is running Fedora Core 6's 2.6.18-1.2798.fc6 kernel. The
> iptables rules are being set on the receiver (so there should be no odd
> interactions between the sender's SCTP stack and iptables - as far as
> the sender knows the packets have been transmitted and lost in transit).
Yes, that's what I am doing as well. I'll see if I can run a more recent
receiver.
Thanks
-vlad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-06 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-06 9:26 [Lksctp-developers] Fw: Intermittent SCTP multihoming breakage Steve Hill
2007-02-06 21:48 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2007-02-07 20:45 ` Vlad Yasevich
2007-02-08 14:07 ` Steve Hill
2007-02-08 14:15 ` Vlad Yasevich
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-02-05 17:26 Steve Hill
2007-02-05 20:34 ` Vlad Yasevich
2007-02-05 16:53 Steve Hill
2007-02-05 17:07 ` Vlad Yasevich
2007-02-05 14:13 Steve Hill
2007-02-05 16:39 ` Vlad Yasevich
2007-01-03 23:46 Andrew Morton
2007-01-04 0:59 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2007-01-10 11:55 ` Steve Hill
2007-01-10 20:10 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2007-01-11 10:10 ` Steve Hill
2007-01-25 16:32 ` [Lksctp-developers] " Vlad Yasevich
2007-01-25 16:37 ` Vlad Yasevich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45C8F7BA.6010007@hp.com \
--to=vladislav.yasevich@hp.com \
--cc=lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
--cc=steve.hill@dialogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).