From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joseph Jezak Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix code for spec changes of 2/7/2007 Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 14:58:56 -0500 Message-ID: <45CCD280.9070501@gentoo.org> References: <45cca236.+lL/rsW3DbM3elnk%Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> <200702091945.25187.mb@bu3sch.de> <45CCC8B5.3060108@gentoo.org> <200702092026.43006.mb@bu3sch.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Bcm43xx-dev-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, John Linville , Larry Finger To: Michael Buesch Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200702092026.43006.mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: bcm43xx-dev-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org Errors-To: bcm43xx-dev-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org >> This is correct. Why do you think it's a specs bug? > > Because > a) The old one made more sense to me. > b) Write MMIO register 0x3? I mean. What is that? > Could this be PHY or radio register 0x3? > Apologies. You are correct that this should be PHY Register 0x3, not MMIO offset 0x3. I've corrected this in the specs. -Joe