From: Philip Craig <philipc@snapgear.com>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org, isely@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] r8169: more alignment for the 0x8168
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:50:16 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45D13578.8040405@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061204000327.GE3625@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Francois Romieu wrote:
> Two thirds of packets are lost because of misalignment. Users of
> Asus laptop did apparently not notice it.
>
> Reported on Gigabyte GA-945GM-S2.
>
> Fix for http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7517
>
> Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/r8169.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/r8169.c b/drivers/net/r8169.c
> index 0b57050..2379d83 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/r8169.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/r8169.c
> @@ -2018,7 +2018,7 @@ static int rtl8169_alloc_rx_skb(struct p
> if (!skb)
> goto err_out;
>
> - skb_reserve(skb, align);
> + skb_reserve(skb, (align - 1) & (u32)skb->data);
> *sk_buff = skb;
>
> mapping = pci_map_single(pdev, skb->data, rx_buf_sz,
> @@ -2486,7 +2486,7 @@ static inline int rtl8169_try_rx_copy(st
>
> skb = dev_alloc_skb(pkt_size + align);
> if (skb) {
> - skb_reserve(skb, align);
> + skb_reserve(skb, (align - 1) & (u32)skb->data);
> eth_copy_and_sum(skb, sk_buff[0]->data, pkt_size, 0);
> *sk_buff = skb;
> rtl8169_mark_to_asic(desc, rx_buf_sz);
This patch caused a drop in throughput from 178 Mbits/sec to 135 Mbits/sec
on an Intel XScale IXP465.
It seems like there is some confusion about what the align parameter
here means. It was originally an offset from an aligned address so that
the IP header aligned, and this patch changes it to the alignment of the
ethernet header. But align is still set to NET_IP_ALIGN for some chips.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-13 4:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-03 23:52 [PATCH 0/5] Pull request for 'r8169-upstream-20061204-00' tag Francois Romieu
2006-12-03 23:54 ` [PATCH 1/5] r8169: more magic during initialization of the hardware Francois Romieu
2006-12-06 5:28 ` Philip Craig
2006-12-03 23:58 ` [PATCH 2/5] r8169: tweak the PCI data parity error recovery Francois Romieu
2006-12-03 23:59 ` [PATCH 3/5] r8169: phy program update Francois Romieu
2006-12-04 0:03 ` [PATCH 4/5] r8169: more alignment for the 0x8168 Francois Romieu
2007-02-13 3:50 ` Philip Craig [this message]
2007-02-13 8:14 ` Francois Romieu
2007-02-13 23:32 ` Mike Isely
2007-02-23 23:13 ` Francois Romieu
2007-02-26 7:42 ` Philip Craig
2007-02-26 22:25 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-28 21:48 ` Francois Romieu
2007-02-28 23:18 ` Francois Romieu
2007-02-13 23:56 ` Philip Craig
2006-12-04 0:14 ` [PATCH 5/5] r8169: teach yourself arithmetic in 21 days Francois Romieu
2006-12-07 10:07 ` [PATCH 0/5] Pull request for 'r8169-upstream-20061204-00' tag Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45D13578.8040405@snapgear.com \
--to=philipc@snapgear.com \
--cc=isely@pobox.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).