From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] e1000: fix shared interrupt warning message Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 15:38:32 -0500 Message-ID: <45D767C8.3040508@garzik.org> References: <20070216223913.26963.76602.stgit@gitlost.site> <20070216223926.26963.52634.stgit@gitlost.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Brandeburg, Jesse" , "Kok, Auke" , "Ronciak, John" To: "Kok, Auke" Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:47903 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932817AbXBQUie (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Feb 2007 15:38:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20070216223926.26963.52634.stgit@gitlost.site> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Kok, Auke wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg > Signed-off-by: Auke Kok > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton > --- > > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c | 12 ++++++------ > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) applied 1-3, though patch #1 had a noticable lack of description. you should describe your change, not just the condition that prompted it. operation reordering is something that people shouldn't have to /try/ to understand. Things should just be obvious, and if not, document why.