From: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"David P. Reed" <dpreed@reed.com>,
Ayaz Abdulla <aabdulla@nvidia.com>,
jgarzik@pobox.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Albert Hopkins <kernel@marduk.letterboxes.org>,
Bob Tracy <rct@gherkin.frus.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@mellanox.co.il>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:33:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45E3ECF1.4040906@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1172564491.3709.5.camel@chaos>
Thomas Gleixner napisał(a):
> Adrian,
>
> On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 23:05 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> Subject : kernel BUG at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:168 (CONFIG_NO_HZ)
>> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/16/346
>> Submitter : Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
>> Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Status : problem is being debugged
>
> The BUG_ON() was replaced by a warning printk(). The BUG_ON() exposed a
> problem with the SMT scheduler. See below.
>
>> Subject : BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0
>> NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 20 (SMT scheduler)
>> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/20/257
>> Submitter : Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
>> Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>> Status : problem is being debugged
>
> Patch available, not confirmed yet.
>
I can confirm that the bug is fixed (over 20 hours of testing should be enough).
Huge thanks!
Regards,
Michal
--
Michal K. K. Piotrowski
LTG - Linux Testers Group (PL)
(http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/ltg/)
LTG - Linux Testers Group (EN)
(http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/linux_testers_group_en/)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-27 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702202043280.4043@woody.linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-25 18:02 ` 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 3) Adrian Bunk
2007-02-25 20:59 ` Greg KH
2007-02-26 22:05 ` 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2) Adrian Bunk
2007-02-27 8:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-02-27 8:33 ` Michal Piotrowski [this message]
2007-02-27 8:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-02-27 8:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-02-27 8:35 ` Michal Piotrowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45E3ECF1.4040906@googlemail.com \
--to=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=aabdulla@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@sirena.org.uk \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=dpreed@reed.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=kernel@marduk.letterboxes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mst@mellanox.co.il \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rct@gherkin.frus.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).