From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Greear Subject: ppp and routing table rules. Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 20:46:41 -0800 Message-ID: <45E7AC31.9030309@candelatech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: NetDev Return-path: Received: from ns2.lanforge.com ([66.165.47.211]:39759 "EHLO ns2.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422881AbXCBEok (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 23:44:40 -0500 Received: from [71.112.198.166] (pool-71-112-198-166.sttlwa.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.112.198.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns2.lanforge.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l224idv6031872 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 20:44:39 -0800 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hello! I have a suspicion (but no proof at this time) that a rule like this: 20: from all iif ppp400 lookup 10001 is not actually working for ppp interfaces. Before I go adding printk statements, are there any stats that would show if packets are hitting a particular rule or routing table? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com