From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] iproute2 2.6.20-070313 Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:42:40 +0100 Message-ID: <45F85E40.6050409@trash.net> References: <20070313151549.332004c9@freekitty> <200703141223.48927.arekm@maven.pl> <45F7E527.6030307@trash.net> <200703141316.05509.arekm@maven.pl> <45F7EB5C.5010901@trash.net> <20070314101443.4347efdd@freekitty> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz , lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070314101443.4347efdd@freekitty> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl Errors-To: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:32:28 +0100 > Patrick McHardy wrote: > >>RTA_* attributes aren't used for routing rules anymore inside >>the kernel. > > > But we need to keep them in iproute2 for back compatibility? Not really for compatibility, its the numerical values that matter. iproute hasn't been changed to use the FRA_* attributes for routing rules, but it might be a good idea to do this before adding the next RTA_* attribute since RTA_FWMASK doesn't have any meaning for routes in the kernel, so the next RTA attribute we add could just use the same value instead of leaving a hole.