From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Denys <denys@visp.net.lb>
Cc: Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: iproute2-2.6.20-070313 bug ?
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:43:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4602880F.1010403@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070322132637.M88445@visp.net.lb>
Denys wrote:
>>>Another thing, it is working well
>>>with old tc. Just really if i have plenty of RAM's and i want 32second
>>>buffer, why i cannot have that, and if i see it is really possible before?
>>
>>I know it worked before. But I can't think of a reason why anyone
>>would want a buffer that large. Why do you want to queue packets
>>for up to 64 seconds?
>
> Seems i misunderstand how it works. If i am not wrong, till buffer available,
> bandwidth will be given on "peakrate" speed, and when buffer is empty - on
> "rate" speed. I am wrong?
No, I got confused, sorry about that. Your configuration allows bursts
up to 64 seconds long. I guess there's nothing wrong with that.
I already asked Stephen to revert that patch, it was not meant to
be included yet, unfortunately it made it into the release. Even
more unfortunate is that it looks like we need larger types in the
ABI to properly support nano-second resolution.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-22 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-21 18:00 iproute2-2.6.20-070313 bug ? Denys
2007-03-22 11:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-22 12:46 ` Denys
2007-03-22 13:09 ` Patrick McHardy
[not found] ` <20070322131245.M85528@visp.net.lb>
2007-03-22 13:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-22 13:35 ` Denys
[not found] ` <20070322132637.M88445@visp.net.lb>
2007-03-22 13:43 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2007-03-22 13:47 ` Denys
2007-03-22 13:26 ` Denys
2007-03-22 17:12 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-22 17:14 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-26 18:49 ` more... iproute2/htb/whatever critical " Denys
2007-03-27 15:10 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-27 15:18 ` Denys
2007-03-27 16:00 ` Denys
2007-03-27 16:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-28 17:38 ` another " Denys
2007-03-28 23:55 ` Denys
2007-03-29 10:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-31 2:26 ` more iproute2 issues (not critical) Denys
2007-03-31 2:31 ` Denys
2007-03-31 14:16 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-04 0:03 ` one more... iproute commands lockup whole system Denys
2007-04-04 1:10 ` jamal
2007-04-04 1:39 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-04 2:09 ` jamal
2007-04-04 2:11 ` Denys
2007-04-04 10:55 ` jamal
2007-04-04 12:56 ` Denys
2007-04-04 14:10 ` jamal
2007-04-04 14:35 ` Denys
2007-04-04 14:13 ` HTB/act_mirred problem [was: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system] Patrick McHardy
2007-04-04 14:33 ` jamal
2007-04-04 14:50 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-05 1:33 ` jamal
2007-04-04 13:36 ` one more... iproute commands lockup whole system Patrick McHardy
2007-04-04 13:58 ` jamal
2007-04-04 14:07 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-04 14:30 ` jamal
2007-04-04 14:39 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-05 2:14 ` jamal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4602880F.1010403@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=denys@visp.net.lb \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).