From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Borkmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] test_bpf: Fix testing with CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y on other arches Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 23:07:08 +0100 Message-ID: <46037c83-d612-63f7-00d2-d37a35ca4fe7@iogearbox.net> References: <20180320125851.19650-1-cascardo@canonical.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yonghong Song , Alexei Starovoitov To: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180320125851.19650-1-cascardo@canonical.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 03/20/2018 01:58 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: > Function bpf_fill_maxinsns11 is designed to not be able to be JITed on > x86_64. So, it fails when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y, and > commit 09584b406742 ("bpf: fix selftests/bpf test_kmod.sh failure when > CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y") makes sure that failure is detected on that > case. > > However, it does not fail on other architectures, which have a different > JIT compiler design. So, test_bpf has started to fail to load on those. > > After this fix, test_bpf loads fine on both x86_64 and ppc64el. > > Fixes: 09584b406742 ("bpf: fix selftests/bpf test_kmod.sh failure when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y") > Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Yep, agree. Applied to bpf tree, thanks Thadeu!