From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com>,
e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, jgarzik@pobox.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [1/5] 2.6.21-rc5: known regressions
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:54:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <460AB9E8.8070803@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070327015929.GY16477@stusta.de>
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Subject : e1000 resume weirdness
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/26/91
> Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Handled-By : Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com>
> Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
> Status : problem is being debugged
The issue comes from a corner case and the underlying problem is that e1000
isn't stopping tx properly. We have a fix for this pending in our tree that I'll
push upstream for 2.6.22 to Jeff, but I don't think this should be a blocker and
it's probably is not a regression at all, the gap has always been present.
on a side note, this is probably fixed easily by turning the adapters
detect_tx_hung flag off in e1000_down, so if someone spots this reoccurring
somewhat regularly, please contact me so we can debug it. I myself have a system
suspend/resuming in circles for an hour now with traffic flying across without a
single hit on it....
Adrian, you probably want to drop this issue from your list.
Cheers,
Auke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-28 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703251559560.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org>
2007-03-27 1:59 ` [1/5] 2.6.21-rc5: known regressions Adrian Bunk
2007-03-28 18:54 ` Kok, Auke [this message]
2007-03-28 19:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-30 18:04 ` Adrian Bunk
[not found] ` <20070327230024.GJ16477@stusta.de>
2007-03-28 0:50 ` 2.6.21-rc5: known regressions with patches Jay Cliburn
2007-03-30 21:32 ` [2/4] 2.6.21-rc5: known regressions (v2) Adrian Bunk
2007-03-30 21:32 ` [3/4] " Adrian Bunk
2007-03-31 2:52 ` Jeff Chua
2007-04-13 16:32 ` Michal Piotrowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=460AB9E8.8070803@intel.com \
--to=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).