From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bill Davidsen Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled eepro100 removal Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:17:59 -0400 Message-ID: <460AE997.90509@tmr.com> References: <20070325145810.GI16477@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070325145810.GI16477@stusta.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Adrian Bunk wrote: > This patch contains the scheduled removal of the eepro100 driver. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk > > This keeps coming around, but I haven't seen an answer to the questions raised by Eric Piel or Kiszka. I do know that e100 didn't work on some IBM rackmount servers and eepro100 did, but since I'm no longer responsible for those machines I can't retest. Perhaps someone will be able to provide data points. IBM current offerings as of about three years ago, I had a few dozen of them at one time. -- Bill Davidsen "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot