From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Kok, Auke" Subject: Re: [RFT] e100 driver on ARM Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:04:32 -0700 Message-ID: <460AF480.7050609@intel.com> References: <44FC0261.6010807@garzik.org> <20060904123123.GB1285@xi.wantstofly.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeff Garzik , Netdev List , Linux Kernel , Andrew Morton , Russell King To: Lennert Buytenhek Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:31787 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965795AbXC1XEe (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:04:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060904123123.GB1285@xi.wantstofly.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 06:39:29AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> 1) Does e100 driver work on ARM? > > FWIW, e100 seems to work okay for me on an intel ixp2400 (xscale based) > board, an ixp2850 (xscale based) board and an ixp2350 (xscale3 based) > board. ixp2350 works both with hardware coherency turned on (cpu > snoops bus) and turned off (manual dma cache clean/invalidate as usual.) > > As for the other ARM platforms that I'm interested in / have hardware > for / maintain, the at91/ep93xx/pxa270 don't have PCI, and the other > two (iop32x/iop33x) I can't test because I don't have such systems with > e100 NICs, but I expect those would work, since they're both xscale > based like the ixp2400, and the ixp2400 works. I just got an iop342 board dropped on my lap. Once it's running, I'll make sure to make this the first thing to test. Cheers, Auke