From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Chris Friesen" Subject: Re: [Bonding-devel] quick help with bonding? Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:26:07 -0600 Message-ID: <460C672F.404@nortel.com> References: <460BE5F0.7070606@nortel.com> <20070329181617.GA25770@gospo.rdu.redhat.com> <460C38EF.1080509@nortel.com> <4074.1175207458@death> <460C4EFE.6030505@nortel.com> <20070330003630.GA18319@gospo.rdu.redhat.com> <460C658C.7090803@nortel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jay Vosburgh , netdev@vger.kernel.org, bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To: Andy Gospodarek Return-path: Received: from zcars04e.nortel.com ([47.129.242.56]:49662 "EHLO zcars04e.nortel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1945922AbXC3B0P (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:26:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <460C658C.7090803@nortel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Chris Friesen wrote: > Andy Gospodarek wrote: > >> If you are looking for a decent source for patches you could consider >> downloading the latest source-rpm from RHEL4/CentOS4. The bonding >> driver in those releases have been updated to much later code and I can >> tell you from personal experience they work pretty well. > I'm just about to load a kernel with a backport of bonding from 2.6.14. > I'll try it out and if it doesn't help I'll try the RHEL4 one. No joy on the 2.6.14 backport, so I guess I'll try the RHEL4 route. Chris