From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Greear Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add etun driver Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 14:38:50 -0700 Message-ID: <4616BDEA.1080502@candelatech.com> References: <20070406133420.2f098bc6@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Jeff Garzik , Andrew Morton , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Kuznetsov , Daniel Lezcano , Dmitry Mishin , Linux Containers To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from ns2.lanforge.com ([66.165.47.211]:57919 "EHLO ns2.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933058AbXDFVjd (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Apr 2007 17:39:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070406133420.2f098bc6@localhost> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Why not implement a true virtual network rather than simple > tunnel pairs? > What would a true virtual network do? You mean with routers and such? I use my redirect device (basically same as etun) to join virtual routers together, but all of the virtual routing (and bridging, etc) logic is already in the kernel and just has to be configured properly.... Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com