From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com,
cramerj@intel.com, auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com,
christopher.leech@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NET: [UPDATED] Multiqueue network device support implementation.
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:48:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <461B5D79.9040307@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070410003243.32106.98266.stgit@gitlost.site>
Peter P Waskiewicz Jr wrote:
> + /* To retrieve statistics per subqueue - FOR FUTURE USE */
> + struct net_device_stats* (*get_subqueue_stats)(struct net_device *dev,
> + int queue_index);
Please no future use stuff, just add it when you need it.
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 219a57f..c11c8fa 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -3326,12 +3328,23 @@ struct net_device *alloc_netdev(int sizeof_priv, const char *name,
> if (sizeof_priv)
> dev->priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>
> + alloc_size = (sizeof(struct net_device_subqueue) * queue_count);
> +
> + p = kzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!p) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "alloc_netdev: Unable to allocate queues.\n");
> + return NULL;
This leaks the device. You treat every single-queue device as having
a single subqueue. If it doesn't get too ugly it would be nice to avoid
this and only allocate the subqueue states for real multiqueue devices.
> --- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> @@ -133,7 +133,8 @@ static inline int qdisc_restart(struct net_device *dev)
> /* And release queue */
> spin_unlock(&dev->queue_lock);
>
> - if (!netif_queue_stopped(dev)) {
> + if (!netif_queue_stopped(dev) &&
> + !netif_subqueue_stopped(dev, skb->queue_mapping)) {
> int ret;
>
> ret = dev_hard_start_xmit(skb, dev);
> @@ -149,7 +150,6 @@ static inline int qdisc_restart(struct net_device *dev)
> goto collision;
> }
> }
> -
Unrelated whitespace change.
> /* NETDEV_TX_BUSY - we need to requeue */
> /* Release the driver */
> if (!nolock) {
> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_prio.c b/net/sched/sch_prio.c
> index 5cfe60b..7365621 100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_prio.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_prio.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ struct prio_sched_data
> struct tcf_proto *filter_list;
> u8 prio2band[TC_PRIO_MAX+1];
> struct Qdisc *queues[TCQ_PRIO_BANDS];
> + u16 band2queue[TC_PRIO_MAX + 1];
> };
>
>
> @@ -63,20 +64,26 @@ prio_classify(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch, int *qerr)
> case TC_ACT_SHOT:
> return NULL;
> };
> -
Same here
> if (!q->filter_list ) {
> #else
> if (!q->filter_list || tc_classify(skb, q->filter_list, &res)) {
> #endif
> if (TC_H_MAJ(band))
> band = 0;
> + skb->queue_mapping =
> + q->prio2band[q->band2queue[band&TC_PRIO_MAX]];
> +
Does this needs to be cleared at some point again? TC actions might
redirect or mirror packets to other (multiqueue) devices.
> @@ -242,6 +259,30 @@ static int prio_tune(struct Qdisc *sch, struct rtattr *opt)
> }
> }
> }
> + /* setup queue to band mapping */
> + if (q->bands < sch->dev->egress_subqueue_count) {
> + qmapoffset = 1;
> + mod = 0;
> + } else {
> + mod = q->bands % sch->dev->egress_subqueue_count;
> + qmapoffset = q->bands / sch->dev->egress_subqueue_count +
> + ((mod) ? 1 : 0);
> + }
> +
> + queue = 0;
> + offset = 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < q->bands; i++) {
> + q->band2queue[i] = queue;
> + if ( ((i + 1) - offset) == qmapoffset) {
> + queue++;
> + offset += qmapoffset;
> + if (mod)
> + mod--;
> + qmapoffset = q->bands /
> + sch->dev->egress_subqueue_count +
> + ((mod) ? 1 : 0);
> + }
> + }
Besides being quite ugly, I don't think this does what you want.
For bands < queues we get band2queue[0] = 0, all others map to 1.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-10 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-10 0:32 [PATCH] NET: [UPDATED] Multiqueue network device support implementation Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2007-04-10 0:28 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-10 1:40 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-10 9:04 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-11 16:52 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-11 17:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-12 5:24 ` Zhu Yi
2007-04-10 9:48 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2007-04-10 16:27 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-11 5:47 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-11 15:40 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=461B5D79.9040307@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=christopher.leech@intel.com \
--cc=cramerj@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).