netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Heffner <jheffner@psc.edu>
To: Robert Iakobashvili <coroberti@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, greearb@candelatech.com
Subject: Re: TCP connection stops after high load.
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 11:31:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46224561.9010801@psc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e63f56c0704150514q3b1271e8lcc9e8f30387d7540@mail.gmail.com>

Robert Iakobashvili wrote:
> Vanilla 2.6.18.3 works for me perfectly, whereas 2.6.19.5 and
> 2.6.20.6 do not.
> 
> Looking into the tcp /proc entries of 2.6.18.3 versus 2.6.19.5
> tcp_rmem and tcp_wmem are the same, whereas tcp_mem are
> much different:
> 
> kernel                  tcp_mem
> ---------------------------------------
> 2.6.18.3    12288 16384 24576
> 2.6.19.5      3072    4096   6144
> 
> 
> Is not it done deliberately by the below patch:
> 
> commit 9e950efa20dc8037c27509666cba6999da9368e8
> Author: John Heffner <jheffner@psc.edu>
> Date:   Mon Nov 6 23:10:51 2006 -0800
> 
>    [TCP]: Don't use highmem in tcp hash size calculation.
> 
>    This patch removes consideration of high memory when determining TCP
>    hash table sizes.  Taking into account high memory results in tcp_mem
>    values that are too large.
> 
> Is it a feature?
> 
> My machine has:
> MemTotal:       484368 kB
> and
> for all kernel configurations are actually the same with
> CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y
> 
> Thanks,
> 

Another patch that went in right around that time:

commit 52bf376c63eebe72e862a1a6e713976b038c3f50
Author: John Heffner <jheffner@psc.edu>
Date:   Tue Nov 14 20:25:17 2006 -0800

     [TCP]: Fix up sysctl_tcp_mem initialization.

     Fix up tcp_mem initial settings to take into account the size of the
     hash entries (different on SMP and non-SMP systems).

     Signed-off-by: John Heffner <jheffner@psc.edu>
     Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

(This has been changed again for 2.6.21.)

In the dmesg, there should be some messages like this:

IP route cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)
TCP established hash table entries: 131072 (order: 8, 1048576 bytes)
TCP bind hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes)
TCP: Hash tables configured (established 131072 bind 65536)

What do yours say?

Thanks,
   -John

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-15 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-12 21:11 TCP connection stops after high load Robert Iakobashvili
2007-04-12 21:15 ` David Miller
2007-04-15 12:14   ` Robert Iakobashvili
2007-04-15 15:31     ` John Heffner [this message]
2007-04-15 15:49       ` Robert Iakobashvili
2007-04-16 18:07         ` John Heffner
2007-04-16 18:51           ` Robert Iakobashvili
2007-04-16 19:11             ` John Heffner
2007-04-16 19:17               ` David Miller
2007-04-16 19:15             ` David Miller
2007-04-17  7:58               ` Robert Iakobashvili
2007-04-17 19:39                 ` David Miller
2007-04-17 19:47                   ` John Heffner
2007-04-17 19:51                     ` David Miller
2007-04-17 19:58                   ` Robert Iakobashvili
2007-04-15 13:52   ` Robert Iakobashvili
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-11 18:50 Ben Greear
2007-04-11 20:26 ` Ben Greear
2007-04-11 20:48   ` David Miller
2007-04-11 21:06     ` Ben Greear
2007-04-11 21:11       ` David Miller
2007-04-11 21:31         ` Ben Greear
2007-04-11 21:39           ` David Miller
2007-04-12  2:44           ` SANGTAE HA
2007-04-12  1:06       ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-04-12 14:48       ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-12 17:59         ` Ben Greear
2007-04-12 18:19           ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-12 19:12             ` Ben Greear
2007-04-12 20:41               ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-12 21:36                 ` Ben Greear
2007-04-13  7:09                   ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-04-13 16:42                     ` Ben Greear
2007-04-13 16:10             ` Daniel Schaffrath
2007-04-13 16:41               ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-14  4:21                 ` Herbert Xu
2007-04-14  4:25                   ` David Miller
2007-04-14  5:31                   ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-14  5:37                     ` David Miller
2007-04-11 20:41 ` David Miller
2007-04-12  6:12 ` Ilpo Järvinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46224561.9010801@psc.edu \
    --to=jheffner@psc.edu \
    --cc=coroberti@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).