From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [RFT] e100 driver on ARM Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:12:25 -0400 Message-ID: <4630C159.1060707@garzik.org> References: <44FC0261.6010807@garzik.org> <20060904123123.GB1285@xi.wantstofly.org> <460AF480.7050609@intel.com> <460B4BF2.1070803@roinet.com> <20070329141041.GA3510@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <46239138.4040408@roinet.com> <20070417173507.GB5575@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <4630AC02.7040706@roinet.com> <20070426135013.GA12154@xi.wantstofly.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Acker , Lennart Sorensen , "Kok, Auke" , Netdev List , Linux Kernel , Andrew Morton , Russell King To: Lennert Buytenhek Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:58459 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031255AbXDZPMi (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:12:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070426135013.GA12154@xi.wantstofly.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > This is all a while ago now, but wasn't the e100 S-bit patch originally > written by Intel people in response to the very same quote by Russell > King that you've quoted above? Correct. I just wanted to make sure it didn't kill any boxes. Jeff