From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/40] Swap over Networked storage -v12 Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 16:29:00 -0400 Message-ID: <463B978C.6050303@garzik.org> References: <20070504102651.923946304@chello.nl> <20070504.122716.31641374.davem@davemloft.net> <1178307709.2767.19.camel@lappy> <20070504.130239.38710262.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, tgraf@suug.ch, James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, michaelc@cs.wisc.edu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, phillips@google.com To: David Miller , a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:51499 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031535AbXEDU3J (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 16:29:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070504.130239.38710262.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org David Miller wrote: > From: Peter Zijlstra > Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 21:41:49 +0200 > >> How would you prefer I present these? > > How about 8 or 9 at a time? You are building infrastructure > and therefore you could post them 1 at a time for review > since each patch should be able to stand on it's own. Indeed. Just glancing over the patchset, there are quite a few "easy to apply" cleanup patches that could be fast-forwarded to upstream, without requiring deep thought on the swap-over-storage MM changes or net allocator changes. Jeff