netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: hadi@cyberus.ca
Cc: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: take 3 [RFC] make qdisc_restart more readable
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 19:02:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4645F325.3060607@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1178972280.4061.7.camel@localhost>

jamal wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index f671cd2..718d6fd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -83,6 +83,9 @@ struct wireless_dev;
>  #define NETDEV_TX_OK 0		/* driver took care of packet */
>  #define NETDEV_TX_BUSY 1	/* driver tx path was busy*/
>  #define NETDEV_TX_LOCKED -1	/* driver tx lock was already taken */
> +#define NETDEV_TX_DROP -2	/* request caller to drop packet */

This shouldn't be a NETDEV_TX code since its only handled correctly
internally for handle_dev_cpu_collision().

> +#define NETDEV_TX_QUEUE -3	/* request caller to requeue packet */

How will this be used? The driver can simply stop the queue if
it doesn't want to receive more packets.

> +static inline int handle_dev_cpu_collision(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	if (dev->xmit_lock_owner == smp_processor_id()) {

unlikely would make sense here.

> +static inline int
> +handle_dev_requeue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, struct Qdisc *q)
> +{
> +
> +	if (unlikely(q == &noop_qdisc))
> +		kfree_skb(skb);

Why is this special-casing needed? __qdisc_run already checks for
noop_qdisc and noop has a proper requeue function.

> +	else if (skb->next)
> +		dev->gso_skb = skb;

The gso_skb cases could probably also be marked unlikely.

> +	else
> +		q->ops->requeue(skb, q);
> +	/* XXX: Could netif_schedule fail? Or is that fact we are
> +	 * requeueing imply the hardware path is closed
> +	 * and even if we fail, some interupt will wake us
> +	*/
> +	netif_schedule(dev);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct sk_buff *
> +try_get_tx_pkt(struct net_device *dev, struct Qdisc *q)
> +{
> +	struct sk_buff *skb = dev->gso_skb;
> +
> +	if (skb)
> +		dev->gso_skb = NULL;
> +	else
> +		skb = q->dequeue(q);
> +
> +	return skb;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int
> +handle_tx_locked(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, struct Qdisc *q)

handle_.* sounds a bit like "I couldn't think of a better name" :)
How about dev_tx_locked()?

> +{
> +	int ret =  (dev);
> +
> +	if (ret == NETDEV_TX_DROP) {
> +		kfree_skb(skb);
> +		return qdisc_qlen(q);
> +	}
> +
> +	return handle_dev_requeue(skb, dev, q);
> +}

> +	if (unlikely (ret != NETDEV_TX_BUSY)) {
> +		/* XXX: Do we need a ratelimit? or put a
> +		 * BUG_ON((int) ret != NETDEV_TX_BUSY) ?
> +		 **/
> +		printk("BUG %s code %d qlen %d\n",dev->name, ret, q->q.qlen);

BUG_ON sounds a bit extreme, net_ratelimit() makes sense.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-12 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-11  0:13 [RFC] make qdisc_restart more readable jamal
2007-05-11 15:56 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-11 18:04   ` jamal
2007-05-11 18:13     ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-11 18:35       ` jamal
2007-05-11 18:46         ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-11 19:29           ` take 2 WAS (RE: " jamal
2007-05-11 22:01             ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-11 22:43               ` jamal
2007-05-12  9:46             ` Thomas Graf
2007-05-12 11:58               ` jamal
2007-05-12 12:18             ` take 3 " jamal
2007-05-12 17:02               ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2007-05-12 19:56                 ` jamal
2007-05-13 14:28                   ` [LAST CALL] [PATCH] [NET_SCHED]make " jamal
2007-05-14 10:40                     ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-14 12:41                       ` jamal
2007-05-14 12:43                         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-14 13:30                     ` jamal
2007-05-14 20:09                       ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-16 22:55                       ` jamal
2007-05-16 23:00                         ` David Miller
2007-05-16 23:15                         ` Sridhar Samudrala
2007-05-17  2:12                           ` jamal
2007-05-11 17:01 ` [RFC] make " Thomas Graf
2007-05-11 18:11   ` jamal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4645F325.3060607@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).