From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Kok, Auke" Subject: Re: [PATCH] [e1000] Lower the MSI unavailable message to INFO priority Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 15:13:24 -0700 Message-ID: <464CD384.5030202@intel.com> References: <200705152359.l4FNxPcS018779@tazenda.hos.anvin.org> <464A512C.9080104@garzik.org> <464B229B.7060702@intel.com> <464CC5EC.4020202@redhat.com> <464CC92B.9080800@intel.com> <464CCD17.4000908@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chuck Ebbert , "H. Peter Anvin" , e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, john.ronciak@intel.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:62129 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755413AbXEQWN1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2007 18:13:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <464CCD17.4000908@garzik.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > Kok, Auke wrote: >> for now. If MSI is breaking with a 10gig adapter I think people >> appreciate the error. > > > No, that is same invalid reasoning discussed earlier in this thread. > ixgb needs patching for this problem too. OK then... A patch that does the exact same for ixgb as I did for e1000 is underway (remove #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI, fix pci_disable_msi leak...). Cheers, Auke