From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Kok, Auke" Subject: Re: e1000: assertion hit in e1000_clean(), kernel 2.6.21.1 Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 16:03:19 -0700 Message-ID: <464E30B7.3030107@intel.com> References: <464E29C8.9090905@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netdev To: Chuck Ebbert Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:54993 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755042AbXERXDW (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2007 19:03:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <464E29C8.9090905@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Chuck Ebbert wrote: > We have several reports now of hitting this assertion in > netif_rx_complete(), inlined in e1000_clean(): > > BUG_ON(!test_bit(__LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED, &dev->state)); > > [] __queue_work+0x51/0x5e > [] et_rx_action+0x94/0x185 > [] __do_softirq+0x5d/0xba > [] do_softirq+0x59/0xb1 > [] local_bh_enable_ip+0x35/0x40 > [] dev_open+0x44/0x62 > [] dev_change_flags+0x46/0xe3 > [] devinet_ioctl+0x250/0x56a > > The second function is "net_rx_action", corrupted > by the serial connection. > > The source file has four extra lines at the top because of a > trivial wireless patch, so 898 in that code is really 894 in > the stock kernel. please shared that code then. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240339 this is lacking a lot of debugging info. Please post *all* the dmesg output, lspci -vvv, ethtool -e ethX, etc. in the bugzilla. Auke