From: Mark Huth <mhuth@mvista.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][af_key]pfkey_add: Optimize SA adds and algorithm probes
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 17:15:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46562AA2.8030102@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070518212148.GA25363@gondor.apana.org.au>
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 02:34:12PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> Actually, I think we should just probe for the specific algorithm
>> requested rather than everything. See patch below.
>
> Doh, forgot to actually remove the probe call :)
>
> [IPSEC] pfkey: Load specific algorithm in pfkey_add rather than all
>
> This is a natural extension of the changeset
>
> [XFRM]: Probe selected algorithm only.
>
> which only removed the probe call for xfrm_user. This patch does exactly
> the same thing for af_key. In other words, we load the algorithm requested
> by the user rather than everything when adding xfrm states in af_key.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
>
> Cheers,
[... snip]
Herbert,
I can verify that this works. The test adds 2000 instances of SAs using
hmac-md5 for authentication and rijndael-cbc for encryption.
Test output is:
root@192.168.150.94:~# lsmod
Module Size Used by
root@192.168.150.94:~#time setkey -f SA_test.txt
real 0m1.072s
user 0m0.048s
sys 0m0.632s
root@192.168.150.94:~#lsmod
Module Size Used by
twofish 10112 0
twofish_common 40192 1 twofish
camellia 32768 0
serpent 25216 0
blowfish 9984 0
ecb 3712 0
aes 28864 2000
xcbc 5768 0
sha256 12416 0
crypto_null 3456 0
root@192.168.150.94:~#
Prior to the patch time was over 42 seconds (possibly longer on 2.6.21).
I'm a bit curious why all of the crypto modules got loaded, but it
doesn't matter.
Thanks for the patch.
Mark Huth
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-25 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-11 1:56 [PATCH][af_key]pfkey_add: Optimize SA adds and algorithm probes Mark Huth
2007-05-18 4:34 ` Herbert Xu
2007-05-18 17:16 ` Mark Huth
2007-05-18 21:21 ` Herbert Xu
2007-05-19 21:21 ` David Miller
2007-05-25 0:15 ` Mark Huth [this message]
2007-05-25 0:20 ` Herbert Xu
2007-05-25 0:36 ` David Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-11 0:59 Mark Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46562AA2.8030102@mvista.com \
--to=mhuth@mvista.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).